IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
- Erica Johnson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC., Plaintiff, vs. CHRIS BOTTICELLA, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-cv RBS DEFENDANT CHRIS BOTTICELLA S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW conclusions of law. Defendant Chris Botticella submits the following proposed findings of fact and FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Mr. Botticella is a senior-level bakery operations executive who began working for Plaintiff Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. ( BBakeries ) in Hr g Tr. 131:4-12, Jan. 25, He has worked in the baking industry for more than thirty-eight years. Id. 80: In eight-plus years of employment with BBakeries, Mr. Botticella received uniformly excellent performance evaluations, and his honesty and loyalty to the company were never questioned. Id. 131:13-132:3. 3. In or about January 2009, BBakeries merged with or acquired the baked goods unit of George Weston Ltd. Through this transaction, BBakeries acquired certain facilities at which Thomas English Muffins are manufactured. Id. 93:8-12.
2 for California. Id. 68: In 2009, Mr. Botticella was the Vice President of BBakeries operations 5. Because BBakeries western operations were not profitable as of January 2009, BBakeries executives including Mr. Botticella and Senior Vice President Daniel Babin embarked on a painful learning process following the January 2009 transaction, the goal of which was to increase the profitability of these western operations. Id. 92:5-93:3. 6. Mr. Botticella grew unhappy with BBakeries over the course of the year 2009 due to the painfulness of this process. Id. 134: On September 28, 2009, Interstate Brands Corporation, another bakery company, which later changed its name to Hostess Brands, Inc. ( Hostess ), offered Mr. Botticella a new employment position as its VP Bakery Operations, East, which he accepted on or about October 15, BBakeries Hr g Ex. 3; C. Botticella Dep. 78:12-15, Jan. 21, The new position at Hostess was to pay $200, per year, which would constitute a pay cut of $50, per year compared to his salary with BBakeries and require a relocation from California to Texas. Hr g Tr. 134:20-24; BBakeries Hr g Ex BBakeries and Hostess are two of only four major competitors in the baking industry. Hr g Tr. 66:24-67: Mr. Botticella chose to remain with BBakeries until January 2009 for two reasons: to ensure that he would receive his bonus for 2009 and to complete two BBakeries projects for which he had responsibility. Id. 132:18-133:12; C. Botticella Dep. 119:08-24, 120:11-121:
3 11. On December 7, 2009, Hostess directed Mr. Botticella to execute an Acknowledgment and Representation Form, which stated that Mr. Botticella would not share any confidential or proprietary BBakeries information with Hostess after beginning his new employment there, and that Hostess management was not interested in obtaining any such information from Mr. Botticella. BBakeries Hr g Ex On January 4, 2010, Mr. Botticella informed his supervisor, Joe Dangelmeier, that he was planning to leave BBakeries effective January 15, BBakeries Hr g Ex There is no evidence that anyone at BBakeries asked Mr. Botticella at this time where he would be going, nor is there any evidence that Mr. Botticella ever denied that he would be joining Hostess. 14. The parameters of Mr. Botticella s rights to compete against BBakeries are set forth in a Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation and Invention Assignment Agreement. BBakeries Hr g Ex. 8. This agreement prohibits Mr. Botticella from competing against BBakeries only during his employment with BBakeries. Id. 2. Following the cessation of employment with BBakeries, Mr. Botticella is prohibited only from using or disclosing BBakeries business information, and soliciting employees or customers. Id There is no evidence that Mr. Botticella s new position with Hostess would involve any responsibility for English muffin production. Hr g Tr. 129:15-130: There is no evidence regarding what Mr. Botticella s responsibilities will be in his new position at Hostess
4 17. There is therefore no evidence that it will be impossible for Mr. Botticella to perform his job at Hostess without using or divulging confidential information of BBakeries. 18. During his last month of employment with BBakeries, consistent with the terms of the Acknowledgment and Representation Form that he had executed for Hostess on December 7, 2009, Mr. Botticella deleted all confidential materials that he would receive from BBakeries sales department, without reading them. BBakeries Hr g Ex. 7; C. Botticella Dep. 91:21-92:12. Mr. Botticella also made an effort not to look at certain other confidential BBakeries documents during this time period. C. Botticella Dep. 125:11-20, 126: During the holiday season immediately prior to the cessation of his employment with BBakeries, Mr. Botticella undertook to delete any of his personal materials that were stored on his company laptop. Id. 131:21-133:21. These materials included his résumé, pictures, and old presentations on which he had worked in the past. Id. 132:17-24; Hrg. Tr. 48: In the process of deleting such personal materials, Mr. Botticella accidentally deleted certain work files. C. Botticella Dep. 132:3-16, 133: As a result, he then asked BBakeries information technology specialist to restore the files. Id. 21. During his final month at BBakeries, Mr. Botticella also used an external device to practice his computer skills specifically, transferring files. Id. 138:18-139: The evidence observed by BBakeries computer forensic expert, Brian Harris, is consistent with this type of usage. Hr g. Tr. 47:19-48:
5 23. Many of the files on which Mr. Botticella practiced were stale or nonconfidential. Id. 50:23-51:3, 52:2-53: There is no evidence that Mr. Botticella retained possession of any confidential documents when he left his employment at BBakeries. 25. All access to documents on Mr. Botticella s computer took place during BBakeries normal business hours. Id. 50: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. To obtain a preliminary injunction, a movant must establish that (a) success on the merits is likely, (b) irreparable injury will result if the requested injunction is denied, (c) granting the injunction will not cause even greater harm to the non-movant, and (d) the public interest favors the granting of injunctive relief. Rogers v. Corbett, 468 F.3d 188, 192 (3d Cir. 2006). 2. It is not likely that BBakeries will succeed on the merits in this case. BBakeries request for this Court to enjoin Mr. Botticella from working for Hostess is premised on its allegation that, in the absence of an injunction, it would be inevitable for Mr. Botticella to disclose confidential BBakeries trade secrets to Hostess in the course of that employment. 3. The inevitable disclosure doctrine is inapplicable to this matter and BBakeries should not be permitted to rely upon the doctrine as support for its preliminary injunction request. BBakeries memorialized the parameters of Mr. Botticella s right to compete in its Confidentiality, Non-Solicitation and Invention Assignment Agreement of March 13, 2009, which prohibited Mr. Botticella from competing against BBakeries only while employed - 5 -
6 by BBakeries. BBakeries Hr g Ex. 8. The agreement did not place any restrictions upon Mr. Botticella s rights to seek or obtain employment from competitors following the cessation of his employment with BBakeries, provided that he not use or disclose confidential information of BBakeries and that he refrain from soliciting BBakeries customers and employees. Id. Considering that BBakeries had every opportunity to restrict Mr. Botticella s post-employment rights to compete but freely chose not to add such language to its own agreement, it was clearly the intent of both BBakeries and Mr. Botticella to allow Mr. Botticella to compete after leaving BBakeries employ, subject only to the confidentiality and non-solicitation restrictions in the agreement. This clearly expressed contractual intent should trump a loose application of the inevitable disclosure doctrine. 4. Further, under Pennsylvania law, employee non-compete agreements are disfavored as a trade restraint that prevents a former employee from earning a living. Hess v. Gebhard & Co., 570 Pa. 148, 157, 808 A.2d 912, 917 (2002). Thus, they are strictly construed, Harry Blackwood, Inc. v. Caputo, 434 A.2d 169, 170 (Pa. Super. 1981), and are enforceable only if, among other things, they are reasonably limited in time and geographic scope. Bilec v. Auburn & Assoc. Pension Trust, 588 A.2d 538, 541 (Pa. Super. 1991). Plaintiff s request that the Court enjoin Mr. Botticella from working for Hostess is, in essence, a request that the Court rewrite the contract between the parties, in derogation of the above-stated principles. 5. Moreover, even if it assumed arguendo that the inevitable disclosure doctrine applies to this case, BBakeries is not entitled to a preliminary injunction because it has failed to satisfy the doctrine s requirements
7 a. As discussed in greater detail in Mr. Botticella s bench memorandum of January 22, 2010, under Pennsylvania law, a former employer may obtain an injunction barring a former employee from accepting new employment based on a theory of inevitable disclosure only if the former employer establishes that it would be impossible for the employee to perform his duties at the new employer without disclosing trade secrets. Bacharach, Inc. v. Testo, Inc., No WDA 2009, at 9 (Pa. Super. Sept. 4, 2001) (copy of opinion attached hereto as Exhibit A) (explaining and applying Air Prods. & Chems., Inc. v. Johnson, 442 A.2d 1114 (Pa. Super. 1982)). 1 It is insufficient even if the former employee establishes that its former employee is likely to disclose such trade secrets. Id.; see also Victaulic Co. v. Tieman, 499 F.3d 227, 234 (3d Cir. 2007). b. Here, BBakeries has failed to establish even that disclosure by Mr. Botticella to Hostess will be likely upon the commencement of his new employment, let alone impossible to avoid. Indeed, BBakeries has failed to introduce any evidence showing that Mr. Botticella s new job duties would be similar to those he had with BBakeries, or even any evidence describing what those new job duties will be (other than the admission of BBakeries witness, Mr. Babin, that Mr. Botticella will have no responsibility for English muffins at Hostess). Hr g Tr. 129:15-130:2. Thus, BBakeries has fallen woefully short of sustaining its 1 Even in Air Products, the court did not prevent the employee from working for a competitor. To the contrary, the trial court ruled that the defendant (Mr. Johnson) could commence working for the new employer (Liquid Air), but simply enjoined Liquid Air from employing Mr. Johnson in its on-site operations, which represented one small component of the new employer s business. 442 A.2d at The Superior Court affirmed that ruling
8 burden of proving that Mr. Botticella would inevitably use or disclose its trade secrets and confidential information during his employment with Hostess. c. There is also no evidence that Mr. Botticella has any inclination to provide Hostess with confidential information from BBakeries. Mr. Babin admitted that in eight-plus years of employment with BBakeries, Mr. Botticella received uniformly excellent performance evaluations, and that his honesty and loyalty to the company were never questioned. Id. 131:13-132:3. Likewise, there is no evidence that Mr. Botticella retained any confidential documents when he left BBakeries. Even BBakeries own computer forensic expert, Mr. Harris, testified that Mr. Botticella s computer usage was consistent with his testimony that he only used a thumb drive to practice file transfers, that all such activity took place during BBakeries normal business hours, and that many of the files on which Mr. Botticella practiced were stale or nonconfidential. Id. 47:19-48:6, 50:13-51:3, 52:2-53:20. In addition, Mr. Botticella demonstrated that he had no inclination to divulge confidential information to Hostess when he signed Hostess Acknowledgment and Representation Form on December 7, BBakeries Hr g Ex For the same reasons discussed above, BBakeries has also failed to show that it would suffer irreparable injury in the absence of an injunction. BBakeries has failed to introduce any evidence of what Mr. Botticella s new job duties will be. Thus, there is no evidence in this record that would support a finding of this Court that Mr. Botticella s performance of his duties at Hostess will cause any injury, let alone irreparable injury, to BBakeries. 7. Similarly, BBakeries cannot dispute that granting the injunction will cause even greater harm to Mr. Botticella. As Mr. Babin himself acknowledged in his testimony - 8 -
9 before the Court, Mr. Botticella has worked in the baking industry for more than thirty-eight years. Hr g Tr. 80:4-5. Hostess and BBakeries are two of only four competitors in the baking industry. Id. 66:24-67:3. The number of executive-level positions within Mr. Botticella s expertise is therefore extremely limited, and even if a position were available with one of the other two competitors in the industry, BBakeries would presumably seek to enjoin Mr. Botticella from being employed there as well. BBakeries motion for an injunction preventing Mr. Botticella from working for Hostess is therefore equivalent for all practical purposes to a request to prevent Mr. Botticella from being employed at all. 8. Finally, BBakeries cannot establish that public policy favors its request for a preliminary injunction. Pennsylvania law clearly disfavors non-compete agreements and closely construes them against employers. See, e.g,. Hess v. Gebhard Co., 769 A.2d 1186, 1191 (Pa. Super. 2001), rev d on other grounds, 570 Pa. 148, 157, 808 A.2d 912, 917 (2002). An expansive interpretation of the inevitable disclosure doctrine would be inconsistent with these settled legal principles. 9. Accordingly, BBakeries has failed to satisfy any of the prerequisites for obtaining a preliminary injunction and its request must be denied. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Elizabeth K. Ainslie Elizabeth K. Ainslie (Pa. I.D. No ) SCHNADER HARRISON SEGAL & LEWIS LLP 1600 Market Street, Suite 3600 Philadelphia, PA (215) Dated: January 29, Counsel for Defendant Chris Botticella - 9 -
10 EXHIBIT A
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 29, 2010, I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing Defendant Chris Botticella s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law to be served upon the following counsel of record via the ECF System and first class mail. Michael L. Banks, Esquire Victoria L. Gorokhovich, Esquire Kasturi Sen, Esquire Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA Counsel for Plaintiff Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. /s/ Elizabeth K. Ainslie Elizabeth K. Ainslie
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,
Case :-cv-0-fjm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 GRAIF BARRETT & MATURA, P.C. Kevin C. Barrett, State Bar No. 00 Jeffrey C. Matura, State Bar No. 0 0 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 00 Telephone:
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session EVAN J. ROBERTS v. MILLER INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 00-1035 W. Frank Brown,
More informationCase 4:14-cv BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:14-cv-00368-BRW Document 58 Filed 12/04/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION COOLING & APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, INC. PLAINTIFF V.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-1356 Selective Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Smart Candle, LLC, a Minnesota
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. GWENDOLYN STEWART-JEFFERY, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-24-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 1:14-cv AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:14-cv-00220-AJS Document 1 Filed 08/21/14 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Case 1:08-cv-00605-LJO-GSA 1:07-cv-01347-LJO-GSA Document 3561 Filed 01/27/2009 01/27/09 Page Page 1 of 14 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Todd M. Schneider
More informationCase 1:16-cv JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 1:16-cv-00308-JMS-DML Document 1 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) AMAZON.COM, INC., a/k/a ) AMAZON.COM AUCTIONS, INC. ) ) Defend ant.
More informationCase 3:07-cr KC Document 574 Filed 01/12/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Case No.
Case 3:07-cr-00087-KC Document 574 Filed 01/12/11 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LUIS POSADA CARRILES, Defendant.
More informationProtecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond
Protecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond Jeffrey D. Polsky, Esq., Partner, Fox Rothschild LLP May 8, 2017 1 Types of Intellectual Property Trademark a recognizable sign, design, or expression
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT
8/31/2015 4:34:54 PM 15CV23200 1 2 3 4 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Capacity Commercial Group, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, vs.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 19, 2009 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 19, 2009 Session DREXEL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. v. GERALD MCDILL Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-004539-06, Div. I John
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION GRAFTECH INTERNATIONAL ) HOLDINGS INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. ) RESEARCH IN MOTION, LTD. and )
More informationUnited States Postal Service Law Department OPINION OF THE BOARD. The Postal Service awarded MBD Maintenance, LLC, a contract for construction
BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 2101 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 600 ARLINGTON VA 22201-3078 703-812-1900 FAX: 703-812-1901 ) MBD MAINTENANCE, LLC, ) March 3, 2017 Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
More informationCase 3:02-cv EBB Document 34 Filed 01/20/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Plaintiff,
Case 3:02-cv-01565-EBB Document 34 Filed 01/20/2004 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DONNA SIMLER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. 3:02 CV 01565 (JCH) EDWARD STRUZINSKY
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:15-cv-00765 Document 1 Filed 04/13/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-765 EDWARD K. QUICK, v. Plaintiff, FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., AND MICHELE ZEIER, AN INDIVIDUAL, Defendants.
More informationCase 2:09-cv PJD-PJK Document 19 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:09-cv-14890-PJD-PJK Document 19 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 9 EXPERI-METAL, INC., a Michigan corporation, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LAKESOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877 v. Demand for Jury Trial WAL-MART STORES, INC. and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CANON INC. and CANON U.S.A., INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT
More informationMEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH
MEDICINE LICENSE TO PUBLISH This LICENSE TO PUBLISH (this License ), dated as of: DATE (the Effective Date ), is executed by the corresponding author listed on Schedule A (the Author ) to grant a license
More informationUW REGULATION Patents and Copyrights
UW REGULATION 3-641 Patents and Copyrights I. GENERAL INFORMATION The Vice President for Research and Economic Development is the University of Wyoming officer responsible for articulating policy and procedures
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY, LLC, Defendant.
More informationTruckee Fire Protection District Board of Directors
Truckee Fire Protection District Board of Directors Summary The Truckee Fire Protection District is an independent special district responsible for fire protection and emergency medical transportation
More informationCase 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503
Case 6:15-cv-00584-RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BLUE SPIKE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION RADIO TOWER NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CROSSPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendant.
More informationCase 1:12-cv JD Document 37 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Case 1:12-cv-00130-JD Document 37 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE TOWN OF WOLFEBORO ) ) Civil No. 1:12-cv-00130-JD Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) WRIGHT-PIERCE, )
More informationCall in toll free at and use 7-Digit Access Code
Managing Litigation for In-House Counsel Breakfast Discussion Group Predictive Coding for E-Discovery: Using Computer Intelligence to Facilitate Document Production Steven Schoenfeld, Esq. May 15, 2012
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-3321 JUELITHIA G. ZELLARS, v. Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, DECIDED: December 6, 2006 Respondent.
More informationDAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Case3:13-cv-03287-JSW Document60 Filed11/18/13 Page1 of 3 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Thomas R. Burke (CA State Bar No. 141930 DAVIS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Reed et al v. Freebird Film Productions, Inc. et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REED, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. FREEBIRD FILM PRODUCTIONS,
More informationCase5:11-cv LHK Document1082 Filed05/08/15 Page1 of 5
Case:-cv-00-LHK Document Filed0/0/ Page of Richard M. Heimann (State Bar No. 0) Kelly M. Dermody (State Bar No. ) Brendan P. Glackin (State Bar No. ) Dean M. Harvey (State Bar No. 0) Anne B. Shaver (State
More informationFiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines
Fifth Edition Fiscal 2007 Environmental Technology Verification Pilot Program Implementation Guidelines April 2007 Ministry of the Environment, Japan First Edition: June 2003 Second Edition: May 2004 Third
More informationElena R. Baca. Los Angeles. Orange County. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education
Elena R. Baca Partner, Employment Law Department elenabaca@paulhastings.com Elena Baca is chair of Paul Hastings Los Angeles office and co-vice chair of the Employment Law practice. Ms. Baca is recognized
More informationCase 3:14-cv PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:14-cv-01528-PK Document 53 Filed 04/23/15 Page 1 of 7 Victor J. Kisch, OSB No. 941038 vjkisch@stoel.com Todd A. Hanchett, OSB No. 992787 tahanchett@stoel.com John B. Dudrey, OSB No. 083085 jbdudrey@stoel.com
More informationCase 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 4:16-cv-00746 Document 1 Filed 09/27/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Neal Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Bullet Proof Diesel
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ZAVALA LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.
More informationThe Ethics of Artificial Intelligence
The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence Prepared by David L. Gordon Office of the General Counsel Jackson Lewis P.C. (404) 586-1845 GordonD@jacksonlewis.com Rebecca L. Ambrose Office of the General Counsel
More informationLewis-Clark State College No Date 2/87 Rev. Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7
Policy and Procedures Manual Page 1 of 7 1.0 Policy Statement 1.1 As a state supported public institution, Lewis-Clark State College's primary mission is teaching, research, and public service. The College
More informationUNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Paper No. Date Filed: August 8, 2013 Filed on behalf of: Medtronic, Inc. By: Justin J. Oliver MEDVASCIPR@fchs.com (202) 530-1010 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL
More informationCase 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:11-cv-01165-BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5 David K. Broadbent (0442) Cory A. Talbot (11477) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 S. Main Street, Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801)
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Cross-Complainant Western National Construction ("Western") in this action.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GREEN & HALL, A Professional Corporation MICHAEL J. PEPEK, State Bar No. 178238 mpepek@greenhall.com SAMUEL M. DANSKIN, State Bar No. 136044 sdanskin@greenhall.com MICHAEL A. ERLINGER,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION NEUROGRAFIX; NEUROGRAPHY INSTITUTE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.; IMAGE-BASED SURGICENTER CORPORATION; and AARON G. FILLER, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationIn the ARBITRATION between: Bongani Nunu (Union / Applicant) and. Kansai Plascon (Pty) Ltd (Respondent) PO Box 5217 CAPE TOWN 8000
ARBITRATION AWARD Commissioner: C M Bennett Case No.: WCCHEM 8-13/14 Date of Award: 4 December 2013 In the ARBITRATION between: Bongani Nunu (Union / Applicant) and Kansai Plascon (Pty) Ltd (Respondent)
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G STEVEN BROWNING, EMPLOYEE CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC.
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G600527 STEVEN BROWNING, EMPLOYEE COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER CENTRAL ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, INC., TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, vs. Plaintiff, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., a Delaware corporation;
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF WWW.DISRUPTJ20.0RG THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES OWNED, MAINTAINED, CONTROLLED, OR OPERA TED BY DREAMHOST Special Proceedings No.
More informationLAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998
LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER 1998 LAW ON TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER May 7, 1998 Ulaanbaatar city CHAPTER ONE COMMON PROVISIONS Article 1. Purpose of the law The purpose of this law is to regulate relationships
More informationCase5:13-cv HRL Document15 Filed01/22/13 Page1 of 8
Case:-cv-0-HRL Document Filed0// Page of John J. Edmonds (State Bar No. 00) jedmonds@cepiplaw.com COLLINS, EDMONDS, POGORZELSKI, SCHLATHER & TOWER, PLLC East First Street, Suite 00 Santa Ana, California
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Defendant.
1 1 WI-LAN USA, INC. and WI-LAN, INC., vs. APPLE INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. CASE NO. 1cv0 DMS (BLM) ORDER CONSTRUING
More informationJASON HUSGEN. St. Louis, MO office:
JASON HUSGEN Senior Counsel St. Louis, MO office: 314.480.1921 email: jason.husgen@ Overview Clever, thorough, and with a keen knowledge of the law, Jason tackles complex commercial disputes as part of
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 04-0789 ANGELA L. OZBUN VERSUS CITY OF ALEXANDRIA ************ APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 213,713, HONORABLE
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS. for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies
TERMS AND CONDITIONS for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies Introduction The IMDS Advanced Interface Service (hereinafter also referred to as the IMDS-AI ) was developed
More informationInjury/Disease Form 7 (Tab 2 of Exhibit 2) describes Mr. Youkhanna s occupation at the time of injury as a labourer. 4 Mr. Youkhanna had no managerial
Ontario Supreme Court Youkhanna v. Spina s Steel Workers Co. Date: 2001-11-06 Isaac Youkhanna, Plaintiff and Spina s Steel Workers Co. Ltd., Defendant Ontario Superior Court of Justice MacFarland J. Heard:
More informationTHE MATTER : BEFORE THE SCHOOL
: IN THE MATTER : BEFORE THE SCHOOL : ETHICS COMMISSION OF : : Docket No.: C04-01 JUDY FERRARO, : KEANSBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION : MONMOUTH COUNTY : DECISION : PROCEDURAL HISTORY This matter arises from
More informationIN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT
Vanderburgh Circuit Court Filed: 7/25/2018 12:38 PM Clerk Vanderburgh County, Indiana STATE OF INDIANA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH ) IN THE VANDERBURGH CIRCUIT COURT EVANSVILLE WATER AND SEWER UTILITY,
More informationKRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018
KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018 KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION Your submission of this Online Sales Application does not constitute
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. United States District Court
Case :0-cv-00-MHP Document Filed 0//00 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS LEAGUE, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
More informationLoyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents
Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents Approved by Loyola Conference on May 2, 2006 Introduction In the course of fulfilling the
More informationApril 1, Patent Application Pitfall: Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Software Patent for Inadequate Disclosure
April 1, 2008 Client Alert Patent Application Pitfall: Federal Circuit Affirms Invalidity of Software Patent for Inadequate Disclosure by James G. Gatto On March 28, 2008, the Federal Circuit affirmed
More informationRocco E. Testani, Partner
, Partner 999 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2300 Atlanta, GA 30309-3996 Office: 404.853.8390 rocco.testani@sutherland.com Rocco Testani represents clients in litigation ranging from complex business disputes
More informationCase 3:16-md VC Document 1539 Filed 06/22/18 Page 1 of 6
Case :-md-0-vc Document Filed 0// Page of 0 HOLLINGSWORTH LLP Joe G. Hollingsworth (pro hac vice) Eric G. Lasker (pro hac vice) Martin C. Calhoun (pro hac vice) Heather A. Pigman (pro hac vice) 0 I Street,
More informationx : : : : : : : : : x
Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al Doc. 238 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAUL D. CEGLIA, v. Plaintiff, MARK
More informationCase 1:13-cv ML Document 194 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:13-cv-01036-ML Document 194 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Civil Action No: 1:13-cv-1036 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
More informationWIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF INVENTIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS
ORIGINAL: English DATE: November 1998 E TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION AND PROMOTION INSTITUTE WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WIPO REGIONAL SEMINAR ON SUPPORT SERVICES FOR INVENTORS, VALUATION AND COMMERCIALIZATION
More informationTechnology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard
Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective Michel Jaccard Overview Introduction : IT transactions specifics and outsourcing deals Typical content of an IT outsourcing agreement
More informationWyoming v. United States Department of Interior
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Case Summaries 2015-2016 Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior Keatan J. Williams Alexander Blewett III School of Law at the University of Montana,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
James A. McDevitt United States Attorney Eastern District of Washington Timothy M. Durkin Assistant United States Attorney Post Office Box Spokane, WA 0- Telephone: (0 - Victor Boutros, Trial Attorney
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed October 7, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Washington County, Joel D.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 9-686 / 08-1757 Filed October 7, 2009 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MITCHELL TERRELL SMITH, Defendant-Appellant. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: April 17, 2008 503633 In the Matter of DOROTHY A. BRENNAN, Petitioner, v MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT NEW YORK
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION AZURE NETWORKS, LLC and TRI-COUNTY EXCELSIOR FOUNDATION, v. Plaintiffs, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC., FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR,
More informationCase 1:14-cv PAB Document 75 Filed 12/08/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-02749-PAB Document 75 Filed 12/08/17 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 16 Civil Action No.: 1:14 cv 02749 PAB AUDUBON SOCIETY OF GREATER DENVER, Petitioner, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
More informationCase 5:14-cv BLF Document 265 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:14-cv-02329-BLF Document 265 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3 1 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) Robert F. Lopez (pro hac vice) 2 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 3 I Seattle,
More informationCase 5:08-cv JW Document 16 Filed 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case :0-cv-00-JW Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 David H.S. Commins (CSBN 0) Kenneth C. Webster (CSBN 0) COMMINS & WEBSTER, P.C. 00 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Tel () -0 Fax () - david@commins.com
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:14-cv-06865 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/05/14 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 PBN PHARMA, LLC, AHNAL PUROHIT, and HARRY C. BOGHIGIAN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
More informationCase 5:14-cv BLF Document 264 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 5:14-cv-02329-BLF Document 264 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 3 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) Robert F. Lopez (pro hac vice) 2 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth A venue, Suite 3300 3 Seattle,
More informationIN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF SWAZILAND JUDGMENT
IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF SWAZILAND JUDGMENT Case NO. 462/06 In the matter between: RUFUS VILAKATI Applicant And PALFRIDGE (PTY) LTD Respondent Neutral citation: Rufus Vilakati v Palfridge (Pty) Ltd (462/06)
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 23, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 23, 2005 Session RODNEY WILSON, ET AL. v. GERALD W. PICKENS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. 301614 T.D. John R. McCarroll,
More informationCase 1:11-cr JSR Document 155 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:11-cr-00907-JSR Document 155 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v- RAJAT K. GUPTA, 11 Cr. 907 (JSR) MEMORANDUM ORDER
More informationPaper Entered: April 1, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 24 571 272 7822 Entered: April 1, 2016 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD UBISOFT, INC. and UBISOFT ENTERTAINMENT SA, Petitioner,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER 1718 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Suite 200 Washington, DC 20009 Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. THE UNITED STATES
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:17-cv-00412 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 02/09/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION JACOB BROWN, JOSE CORA, and ROLANDO MARTINEZ,
More informationAlexandra A. Bodnar Shareholder Los Angeles 213-438-5845 alexandra.bodnar@ogletreedeakins.com Ms. Bodnar defends employers in litigation, including wage and hour class actions, harassment, discrimination
More informationPOLICY ON INVENTIONS AND SOFTWARE
POLICY ON INVENTIONS AND SOFTWARE History: Approved: Senate April 20, 2017 Minute IIB2 Board of Governors May 27, 2017 Minute 16.1 Full legislative history appears at the end of this document. SECTION
More informationKey Strategies for Your IP Portfolio
Key Strategies for Your IP Portfolio Jeremiah B. Frueauf, Partner Where s the value?! Human capital! Physical assets! Contracts, Licenses, Relationships! Intellectual Property Patents o Utility, Design
More informationPrivacy Policy SOP-031
SOP-031 Version: 2.0 Effective Date: 18-Nov-2013 Table of Contents 1. DOCUMENT HISTORY...3 2. APPROVAL STATEMENT...3 3. PURPOSE...4 4. SCOPE...4 5. ABBREVIATIONS...5 6. PROCEDURES...5 6.1 COLLECTION OF
More informationKevin S. Mullen. Focus Areas. Overview
Shareholder 100 Congress Avenue Suite 1400 Austin, TX 78701 main: (512) 982-7250 direct: (512) 982-7253 fax: (512) 982-7248 kmullen@littler.com 2001 Ross Avenue Suite 1500, Lock Box 116 Dallas, TX 75201
More informationsmb Doc 5802 Filed 02/19/19 Entered 02/19/19 15:05:04 Main Document Pg 1 of 8
Pg 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, et al CASE NO: 18-35672 CHAPTER 11 (Jointly Administered) IN THE UNITED
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
76D01-1812-PL-000565 Steuben Superior Court Filed: 12/3/2018 1:06 PM Clerk Steuben County, Indiana IN THE STEUBEN CIRCUIT/SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF INDIANA TAYLOR BOLIN, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CAUSE NO.
More informationWorkshop II. OSHA s New Electronic Reporting Rule How to Prepare and Comply. Wednesday, March 22, :15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
Workshop II OSHA s New Electronic Reporting Rule How to Prepare and Comply Wednesday, March 22, 2017 11:15 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Biographical Information William H. Haak, Founder, Haak Law LLC Cleveland,
More informationRANKEN ENERGY CORPORATION LOCATION EXCEPTION. SE/4 SW/4 OF SECTIO N 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE i WEST, GARVIN COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
U BEFORE THE CORPORATION COM, I0jF ay; OF TH E STATE OF OKLAHOM ; ~4 APPLICANT : RELIEF SOUGHT : LEGAL DESCRIPTION : RANKEN ENERGY CORPORATION LOCATION EXCEPTION SE/4 SW/4 OF SECTIO N 8, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,
More informationAt its meeting of June 16, 2011, the State Board of Examiners (Board) reviewed
IN THE MATTER OF : NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION THE CERTIFICATES OF : STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS AMANDA WRIGHT-STAFFORD : ORDER OF REVOCATION : DOCKET NO: 1011-202 At its meeting of June 16, 2011,
More informationMARCH 1997 LAW REVIEW MENORAH IN CITY PARK: UNCONSTITUTIONAL EXCEPTION TO BAN ON PRIVATE PARK DISPLAYS
MARCH 1997 LAW REVIEW MENORAH IN CITY PARK: UNCONSTITUTIONAL EXCEPTION TO BAN ON PRIVATE PARK DISPLAYS James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1997 James C. Kozlowski As illustrated by the case described herein,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee,
2010-1105 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States
More informationMargaret A. Clemens. Focus Areas. Overview
Shareholder 375 Woodcliff Drive 2nd Floor 14450 main: (585) 203-3400 direct: (585) 203-3444 fax: (585) 203-3414 mclemens@littler.com 900 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 main: (212) 583-9600 direct: (585)
More informationRobinson, Carrie v. Vanderbilt University
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 3-10-2017 Robinson, Carrie
More informationCase 1:11-cv JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9
Case 111-cv-07566-JSR Document 33 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 9 Gary P. Naftalis Michael S. Oberman KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 (212) 715-9100
More informationW.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al Doc. 123
W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al Doc. 123 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., and GORE ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS,
More informationClarke B. Nelson, CPA, ABV, CFF, CGMA, MBA Senior Managing Director & Founder InFact Experts LLC
Curriculum Vitae Clarke B. Nelson, CPA, ABV, CFF, CGMA, MBA Senior Managing Director & Founder InFact Experts LLC cnelson@infact-experts.com Salt Lake City Office 175 South Main Street, Suite 630 Salt
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case: 16-2422 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 01/27/2017 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee
More information