CHAPTER 1 INJUNCTIONS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CHAPTER 1 INJUNCTIONS"

Transcription

1 MAREVA INJUNCTIONS ISBN Author: Hamid Ibrahim Binding: Softcover/Extent: 564 pp Publication Price: MYR The law is stated as of September CHAPTER 1 INJUNCTIONS IntroductionIntroduction... 1 Injunctions Meaning ofinjunctions Meaning of... 2 Inherent Jurisdiction of the Court and Specific PrInherent Jurisdiction of the Court and Specific Provisions of the Rules... 3 Jurisdiction to Grant Injunctions MalaysiaJurisdiction to Grant Injunctions Malaysia... 4 Jurisdiction to Grant Injunction SingaporeJurisdiction to Grant Injunction Singapore... 4 Power of the High Court to Grant InjunctionsPower of the High Court to Grant Injunctions... 5 Source of the Power of the High Court to Grant ansource of the Power of the High Court to Grant an Injunction... 6 Grant of Injunctions Discretion of High Court Grant of Injunctions Discretion of High Court... 7 Duty of Judge Hearing an Application For An InjuncDuty of Judge Hearing an Application For An Injunction... 8 Cause of Action Cause of Action... 9 Legal Right Sufficient to Give Rise to A Cause oflegal Right Sufficient to Give Rise to A Cause of Action Pre-existing Cause of Action for Substantial ReliePre-existing Cause of Action for Substantial Relief Whether Statement of Claim Disclosed a Reasonable Cause of Action Cause of Action in the Writ - Interlocutory Inju Cause of Action in the Writ - Interlocutory Injunction Principles to be Applied in Applications for Inter Principles to be Applied in Applications for Interlocutory Injunctions Application for Interlocutory Injunction Duty ofapplication for Interlocutory Injunction Duty of Judge Serious Questions To Be TriedSerious Questions To Be Tried Justice of the CaseJustice of the Case Balance of ConvenienceBalance of Convenience Adequacy and or Inadequacy of DamagesAdequacy and or Inadequacy of Damages 21 Whether Damages would be an Adequate RemedyWhether Damages would be an Adequate Remedy... 21

2 Whether Damages was a Sufficient Remedy Issue ofwhether Damages was a Sufficient Remedy Issue of Law Status QuoStatus Quo CHAPTER 2 INTERLOCUTORY INJUNCTIONS Interlocutory Injunctions - Order 29 of the Rules of the High Court Scope of Order 29 of the Rules of the High Court Specific Property - Order 29 r 2 of the Rules of the High Court Application Must be made by Summons Whether or not a Claim for the Injunction was Included in that Party s Writ TIME FOR MAKING APPLICATION Urgency Propriety of Filing for an Ex Parte Injunction Urgently Application for Ex parte Injunction - Speed Ex Parte Application - Secrecy - Need for secrecy Justification for Proceeding Ex Parte Ex Parte Mandatory Injunctions Delay in Making Application Effect of Delay Equitable Relief - Delay Inordinate Delay - Conduct of Parties Delay - Exercise of Discretion Delay Court to Weigh All Considerations Delay Acquiescence by Plaintiff Duration of Ex Parte Injunction Scope of Order 29 r 1 (2B) of the Rules of the High Court Lapse of Ex Parte Injunction Ex Parte to Inter Partes AFFIDAVIT EVIDENCE Ex Parte Applications - Affidavit Evidence Affidavit in Support Plaintiff s Further Affidavit in Reply Introduction of Fresh Evidence Exhibits Application for Renewal of Injunction - Failure to Resist Application for Renewal of Injunction Suspension of Injunction - Jurisdiction of High court to suspend an injunction Abuse of Process - Multiplicity of Proceedings... 69

3 Application for Injunction - Estoppel Continuation of Mareva Injunction Until Trial Hardship Balance of Convenience Arbitration and Interlocutory Injunctions Temporary Injunction Against the Government Appeal - Function of Appellate Court Court of Appeal Functus Officio Interference with Trial Judge s Exercise of Discretion Appeal against Ruling Appeal Procedure CHAPTER 3 THE MAREVA INJUNCTION Introduction Historical Development Equity & the Mareva Injunction The Law and the Fast Evolving World of Business - Rationale for Granting a Mareva Injunction Development of the Mareva Procedure Worldwide Mareva Injunction Guidelines for Worldwide Mareva Injunction Jurisdiction of Courts to Grant a Mareva Injunction Jurisdiction - Principles and Policy underlying a Mareva Order Mareva Doctrine - Malaysia - Jurisdiction in Malaysia for the Application of the Mareva Doctrine Malaysia - Jurisdiction of the High Court to Grant a Mareva Injunction Inherent Powers of the High Court Inherent Jurisdiction of High Court to grant Mareva Relief Application of Order 92 rule 4 of the Rules of the High Court Mareva Injunctions - Singapore Mareva The Australian Experience Jurisdiction & Correct Principles CHAPTER 4 NATURE AND SCOPE OF A MAREVA INJUNCTION Nature of Mareva Injunction Difference in Scope and Relief Between the Grant of Interlocutory Injunction and Mareva Injunctions

4 Mareva Injunction and the Debtors Act Order under Section 19 of the Debtors Act 1957 v Mareva Injunction - Differences between Two Remedies Caveat and Injunctions Differences Nature of Mareva Injunction Risk of Dissipation of Assets Purpose of a Mareva Injunction SCOPE OF THE RELIEF Mareva Injunction - Not a Remedy of Unlimited Application Scope of Mareva Injunctions and the Assets of the Defendant The Defendant Has Assets Within Jurisdiction Extent of Restraint on Defendant Mareva Injunctions and Assets of a Defendant - Payment to Creditors Alternative Remedies for Attachment of Defendant s Assets Mareva Injunction and Execution Proceedings Mareva Injunction and Garnishee Order Mareva Injunction Not to Inhibit the Ordinary Course of Business or to Interfere with a Defendant s Ordinary Transactions Mareva Injunction and Third Parties Third Party & Variation of Mareva Injunction Principles Relating to the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Assets in Name of Third Party Third Party Assets Third Party - Dispute between Plaintiff and a Third Party as to the Ownership of Assets within Jurisdiction Breach of a Mareva Injunction Order by a Third Party Third Party s Right of Set-off against a Defendant for Liabilities incurred Prior to the Date of the Mareva Order CHAPTER 5 APPLICATION FOR MAREVA INJUNCTION Introduction Application for Mareva Injunction Principles Applicable Essential Requirements for Granting a Mareva Injunction

5 Good Arguable Case & Risk of Dissipation of Assets Test for Mareva Injunction Grant of Mareva Injunction Discretion of Court Balance Of Convenience - Whether Balance Of Convenience Is In Favour Of The Granting Of The Mareva Injunction - The Law Interim Mareva Injunctions Urgency Determination of the Urgency Factor Guidelines to be Observed in An Application for a Mareva injunction Establishing a Prima Facie Case for the grant of a Mareva Injunction- Onus on Plaintiff Just and Convenient Jurisdiction of the Courts & Substantive Claim Locus Standi of Plaintiff Locus Standi Incapacity of Plaintiffs as Directors Plaintiff s Financial Standing Mareva Injunction - Equitable Remedy - Conduct of Plaintiff Cause of Action Onus on Plaintiff Cause of Action - Defamation Mareva Injunction in Defamation Cases Principles Applicable Time for Application and Delay Mareva Order in Excess of the Value of the Pleaded Claim Overstatement of Maximum Upper Limits Determination of Mareva Sum Competing Claims Counterclaim by Defendant Principles Applicable Claim for Damages and/or Additional Costs Application for Mareva Order Affidavits - Rules of the High Court Mareva Affidavit Evidence Conflicting Affidavit Evidence - Resort to Cross-Examination Information obtained in Contravention of Section 97 of the Banking and Financial Institutions Act Mareva - Introduction of Evidence at Inter Partes Stage Fresh Evidence Mareva Injunction - Introduction of Fresh Evidence at Inter Partes Stage Order for Discovery in aid of a Mareva Injunction Validity of Mareva Order Point of Time Extension of Mareva Injunction Interveners Application to Intervene

6 Interest of Intervening Party Effect of Interlocutory Mareva Injunction on a Defendant Approach of Courts Practice Direction [1994] 4 All ER 52, [1994] 1 WLR Standard Form of Order contained in Annexe 3 to the Practice Direction, Mareva Injunctions and Anton Piller Orders Hardship to the Defendant Imposing Conditions Imposition of Extraneous Conditions Imposition of Improper Conditions - Dissolution of Mareva Order Mareva Injunctions Whether Oppressive Acceptance of Guarantee by Plaintiff Oppressive to Impose Mareva Injunction Improperly Made Mareva Injunctions A Mareva Order and Penal Notice Defects in Application Effect on Subsequent Application for Mareva Injunction Sample Ex Parte Mareva Orders Post Judgment Mareva - Power to Grant an Interlocutory Injunction between Final judgment and Execution Post Judgment Mareva Injunction in Aid of Execution Perpetual Mareva Injunction CHAPTER 6 GOOD ARGUABLE CASE Introduction Threshold Good Arguable Case - Requirement of Proof Arguable Case - Defences - Strength or Weakness Good Arguable Case - Good Arguable Defence Post Judgment Mareva Injunction Good Arguable Case Good Arguable Case - Preservation of Status Quo Pending Arbitration Good Arguable Case Building Contract Dispute Good Arguable Case Certificates of Payment Good Arguable Case - Construction Contract Dispute Good arguable Case Guarantee - Liability under a Guarantee Good Arguable Case Land Dispute Whether Mareva Order Obtained for Wrong Purpose

7 CHAPTER 7 RISK OF DISSIPATION OF ASSETS Introduction Object of Mareva Injunction - Risk of Dissipation of Assets Policy Underlying a Mareva Injunction Risk of Dissipation of Assets - Development of the Principles Risk of Dissipation of Assets Applicable Principles Risk of Dissipation of Assets - Jurisdiction to Grant a Mareva Injunction Presence of Requisite Circumstance Assets Within Jurisdiction Evidence of Assets Within Jurisdiction Disclosure of All Assets Within Jurisdiction Pursuit of Information Plaintiff s Burden of Proof Risk of Dissipation of Assets Factors to Be Considered Domicile of Defendant Course of Dealings and the Historical Antecedents of the Defendant s Business Conduct of Defendant Probity of Defendant Conduct of Defendant Lack of Probity Risk of Dissipation of Assets Question of Fact Proof of Dissipation of Assets Matter of Evidence Danger of Default Evidence of Danger of Default A Real Danger of Disposal of Assets Test to Be Applied Inferences can be drawn from Available Evidence Risk of Dissipation of Assets Affidavit Evidence Averment in Affidavit of Threat of Dissipation of Assets Where Defendant is Short of Money Refusal to Pay Disputed Debt Mere Disposal of Funds Insolvency of Defendant and Risk of Dissipation of Assets Evidence of Risk of Dissipation of Assets Real Risk of Dissipating Assets Duty of Court Evidence of Risk of Dissipation of Assets Risk of Dissipation of Assets Plaintiff s Claim Interests of Defendant - Striking a Balance

8 Threat of Disposal of Property - Balance of Convenience Maintaining the Status Quo Error in Evaluation of Evidence Risk of Dissipation of Assets - Construction Contract Dispute Risk of Dissipation of Assets Land Dispute Absence of Risk of Dissipation of Assets Oppression to the Defendant Assets to Be Injuncted - Mareva Sum The Essence of A Mareva Injunction Upper Limit of Mareva Order Disposal of Assets Pending Mareva Injunction Application Ancillary Orders in Aid of Mareva Orders Discovery in Aid of Mareva Injunction Restraining a Defendant from Leaving the Jurisdiction - Ancillary Order to Mareva Injunction Foreign Incorporated Companies Risk of Dissipation of Assets Mareva & Lifting the Corporate Veil Lifting the Corporate Veil Existence of Assets Within the Control of the Defendant Evidence of Fraudulent Purpose or a Dishonest Intent Effective Control Lifting the Corporate Veil Burden of Proof CHAPTER 8 FULL AND FRANK DISCLOSURE Introduction Material Facts Meaning of Full Disclosure of Material Facts Meaning of Materiality of Any Fact - Question of Fact Full Disclosure Principles - Duty of Candour Practicality Striking a Balance Determinor of What is Material for Disclosure Full Disclosure & Ex Parte Applications - Application for Ex parte Injunction- Material Facts Full Disclosure Purpose of Full Disclosure Scope of Duty of Disclosure Full and Frank Disclosure and the Rules of Court Duty Upon an Applicant For An Ex Parte Injunction Application for Ex parte Mareva Injunction - Full and Frank Disclosure of All Material Facts Duty Not To Mislead the Court Duty of Applicant to Disclose Any Anticipated Defence

9 Duty of Applicant to Make Proper Inquiries Affidavit Evidence Principles of Full Disclosure Order 29 r 2A(c) of the Rules of the High Court Order 29 r 2A(d) and (e) of the Rules of the High Court Whether there was Non-Disclosure of Material Facts by the Plaintiff Determination by Court No Suppression of Material Facts Suppression of Material Facts Failure to Make Full Disclosure at Ex Parte Stage Discretion of Court Proof of Material Non-Disclosure Discretion of Court Failure to Make Full Disclosure Court s Discretion Order 29 r 1(2B) of the RHC Fetter of Court s Discretion Whether Non-Disclosure Was Severe Relevant Non Disclosure and Consequences Non Disclosure Approach of the Courts Ex parte Mareva Order Obtained Without Proper Disclosure of Material Facts - Whether Continuation of Mareva Order Should Be Allowed Rules of High Court 1980 Non Disclosure at Inter Partes Stage Without Prejudice Negotiations CHAPTER 9 UNDERTAKING AS TO DAMAGES History of the Undertaking as to Damages Purpose of Undertaking as to Damages Damages which may Constitute Assets Available To Meet The Liability on the Undertaking Clean Hand Principle - Undertaking as to Damages Undertaking as to Damages Plaintiff s Ability to Satisfy Undertaking Undertaking in Damages Financial Position of Plaintiff Proof on a Balance of Probabilities Duty of Judge and Undertaking as to Damages No Assets Within Jurisdiction Security For Undertaking Fortification of the Plaintiff s Undertaking as to Damages Post Judgment Mareva Injunction - Undertaking as to Damages

10 Damages Payable to the Defendant by Plaintiffs on their Undertaking to Pay Damages Remoteness of Damage Measure of Damages - Undertaking as to Damages Measure of Damages CHAPTER 10 VARIATION, DISCHARGE & APPEAL Rights of Defendant Application to Vary or Discharge a Mareva Injunction Angel Bell Order Duty of Court Procedure for Variation of Mareva Injunction Variation of Mareva Injunction Policy Underlying the Mareva Jurisdiction Variation of Mareva Injunction Factors to be Considered Variation of Mareva Injunction Defendant to Disclose All Assets Variation of Mareva Injunction Whether Assets Belonged to Defendant Variation Duty of Court Legitimate Debts Daily Expenses Living Expenses and Legal Costs of the Defendant Variation of Mareva Injunction Payment of Legal Fees Legal Proceedings Abroad Removal Of Assets Burden of Proof Discharge of Mareva Injunction Setting Aside Interlocutory Injunction Dissolution of Injunction Setting Aside Injunction - Jurisdiction of Court to Discharge Interlocutory ex parte Injunction Discharge of Injunction - Factors to be Considered Factors to be Considered in Application to Set Aside Injunctions Conduct of Plaintiff s Solicitors Discharge of Mareva Injunction Motive of Plaintiff Obtaining Security Discharging of Mareva Injunction - Prejudice To The Defendant Application to Discharge Mareva Injunction Rehearing Application to Set Aside Ex Parte Order made in Chambers - Hearing of Motion to Set aside an Ex Parte Order made in Chambers

11 Fresh Evidence Introduction of Fresh Evidence Application to Dissolve a Mareva Injunction - Balance of Convenience Application to Dissolve a Mareva Injunction - Material Non-Disclosure Misleading Averments Discharge of Injunctions Discharge of Injunction - Non-Disclosure of Material and Cogent Relevant Facts Application to Set Aside Mareva Injunction - Abuse of Process Non Compliance of Rules Failure to Give Notice of Intention to Proceed Application to Dissolve a Mareva Injunction Delay Delay - Application for Further Argument in Open Court Effect of Withdrawal of Application to Set Aside Injunction and Appeal Dismissal of Application to Discharge a Mareva Injunction Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Injunction Inter Partes Application as Sequel to Defendant s Successful Application to Discharge an Ex Parte Order Granting a Fresh Injunction Subsequent to Discharge of Injunction Stay of Mareva Injunction Appeal Role and Duty of Appellate Court Appeal against Refusal to Grant Mareva Injunction Effect of Preservation Order Issued by Appellate Court CHAPTER 11 MAREVA & CONTEMPT Contempt of Court Introduction Power to Punish for Contempt of Court Contempt of Court - Standard of Proof Evidence of Contempt Affidavit Evidence Injunctions and Contempt of Court Terms of Injunction and Contempt Contempt Mens Rea Right of Contemnor to be Heard Registrar - Contempt of Court Mareva Injunctions and Contempt of Court Defective Mareva Order & Contempt

12 CHAPTER 12 ANTON PILLER ORDERS Introduction Anton Piller KG v Manufacturing Processes Ltd & Ors Anton Piller Order Malaysia Nature of Anton Piller Order & Duty of Court Anton Piller Order in Aid of a Mareva Injunction Jurisdiction to Grant Anton Piller Order Pre-Conditions For Grant of Anton Piller Order Basic Requirements for an Anton Piller order at Ex Parte Stage Strong Prima Facie Case A Real Possibility Grant of Anton Piller Order Exercise of Court s Discretion Full & Frank Disclosure Anton Piller Order Failure to make a Full Disclosure Non-Disclosure by the Plaintiffs Application to Discharge Anton Piller Order Ground of Material Non-Disclosure by the Plaintiffs Non-Disclosure of Material Facts Time for Determination Documents Need Not Form Part of Subject Matter of Action Court Can Order Discovery of Assets and Delivery Up of such Assets Serious Practical Effects and Consequences of an Anton Piller Order

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Probate efiling Document Types and Fees

Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Probate efiling Document Types and Fees APP005/107 Abandonment of Appeal Submitted NO NO FEE EJ 001 Abstract of Judgment NO $25 NO FORM Account Final or Waiver NO $465* NO FORM Account Trust (Subsequent) NO $465* NO FORM Accounting Conservatorship/Guardianship

More information

S17Y1593. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. MEYERS. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the Review

S17Y1593. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. MEYERS. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the Review In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: December 11, 2017 S17Y1593. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN F. MEYERS. PER CURIAM. This disciplinary matter is before the Court on the report of the Review Panel, which recommends

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2006-3321 JUELITHIA G. ZELLARS, v. Petitioner, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, DECIDED: December 6, 2006 Respondent.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No. COMPLAINT 8/31/2015 4:34:54 PM 15CV23200 1 2 3 4 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Capacity Commercial Group, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, vs.

More information

Building a Sophisticated Litigation Practice Outside the Big Firm

Building a Sophisticated Litigation Practice Outside the Big Firm New York State Bar Association Law Practice Management Committee on Continuing Legal Education Program Starting Your Own Practice in New York Going Solo in the Real World Building a Sophisticated Litigation

More information

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:11-cv BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:11-cv-01165-BSJ Document 2203 Filed 11/20/14 Page 1 of 5 David K. Broadbent (0442) Cory A. Talbot (11477) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 S. Main Street, Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801)

More information

SATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION REGULATIONS 2007 BR 94/2007

SATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION REGULATIONS 2007 BR 94/2007 BR 94/2007 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT 1986 1986 : 35 SATELLITE NETWORK NOTIFICATION AND COORDINATION ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS 1 Citation 2 Interpretation 3 Purpose 4 Requirement for licence 5 Submission

More information

Making a claim? - Some questions to ask yourself

Making a claim? - Some questions to ask yourself EX301 Making a claim? - Some questions to ask yourself This leaflet suggests some questions you ought to ask yourself before making a claim (called issuing a claim ) in a county court. The answers to the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. H Defendants.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. H Defendants. Halliburton Energy Services Inc et al v. NL Industries Inc et al Doc. 405 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC., et al.,

More information

PRACTICE TIPS FOR TRADEMARK PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO

PRACTICE TIPS FOR TRADEMARK PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO PRACTICE TIPS FOR TRADEMARK PROSECUTION BEFORE THE USPTO HERSHKOVITZ IP GROUP INTA 2012 WASHINGTON, D.C. Presented by Brian Edward Banner www.hershkovitzipgroup.com Who am I? I am an Adjunct Professor

More information

JCW Bespoke Legal Services

JCW Bespoke Legal Services Justin Voon Chooi & Wing Advocates & Solicitors JCW comprises 3 Partners together with Associates who are committed to provide top quality, serious and practical legal services to clients. JCW is an energetic

More information

Terms of Business for ICICI Bank Investment Services (effective from October, 2013)

Terms of Business for ICICI Bank Investment Services (effective from October, 2013) Terms of Business for ICICI Bank Investment Services (effective from October, 2013) Section Page No. How does this investment service work? 2 What is this document for? 2 Definitions 3-4 A. Terms and Conditions

More information

IGNORE THIS AT YOUR PERIL! By Luis S. Konski, Fowler Rodriguez Valdes-Fauli

IGNORE THIS AT YOUR PERIL! By Luis S. Konski, Fowler Rodriguez Valdes-Fauli IGNORE THIS AT YOUR PERIL! By Luis S. Konski, Fowler Rodriguez Valdes-Fauli Now that I have your attention, be aware that there has been a seachange in how litigation discovery and internal corporate investigations

More information

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503

Case 6:15-cv RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503 Case 6:15-cv-00584-RWS-CMC Document 78 Filed 02/26/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 4503 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BLUE SPIKE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Case

More information

M. Orr ) Tuesday, the 5th day Deputy Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of June, THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT

M. Orr ) Tuesday, the 5th day Deputy Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of June, THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT File No. CA 006-11 M. Orr ) Tuesday, the 5th day Deputy Mining and Lands Commissioner ) of June, 2012. THE CONSERVATION AUTHORITIES ACT IN THE MATTER OF An appeal to the Minister under subsection 28(15)

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Case: 16-2422 Document: 29 Page: 1 Filed: 01/27/2017 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session EVAN J. ROBERTS v. MILLER INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton County No. 00-1035 W. Frank Brown,

More information

KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018

KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018 KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT Effective: January 1, 2018 KRYPTONITE AUTHORIZED ONLINE SELLER APPLICATION Your submission of this Online Sales Application does not constitute

More information

THE GOLF CLUB AT REDMOND RIDGE CLUB CARD PLAN No Initiation Fee and One Low Monthly Price for Year-Around Golf

THE GOLF CLUB AT REDMOND RIDGE CLUB CARD PLAN No Initiation Fee and One Low Monthly Price for Year-Around Golf THE GOLF CLUB AT REDMOND RIDGE CLUB CARD PLAN No Initiation Fee and One Low Monthly Price for Year-Around Golf BENEFITS: Year-round golf at The Golf Club at Redmond Ridge Mon-Fri Anytime and Saturday,

More information

EUIPO Trade Mark and Design Education Programme Programme of Studies

EUIPO Trade Mark and Design Education Programme Programme of Studies EUIPO Trade Mark and Design Education Programme Version 1.0 25/04/2018 Page 2 of 12 1... 4 Module 1: Introduction... 4 Module 2: Procedural and evidentiary issues... 4 Module 3: Proceedings before the

More information

WILLIAM M. OJILE, JR.

WILLIAM M. OJILE, JR. WILLIAM M. OJILE, JR. PARTNER Denver, CO 303.575.4000 bojile@armstrongteasdale.com Bill Ojile has over 30 years of experience advising, counseling and trying cases on behalf of companies. He also serves

More information

Rocco E. Testani, Partner

Rocco E. Testani, Partner , Partner 999 Peachtree Street, NE Suite 2300 Atlanta, GA 30309-3996 Office: 404.853.8390 rocco.testani@sutherland.com Rocco Testani represents clients in litigation ranging from complex business disputes

More information

Policy on Patents (CA)

Policy on Patents (CA) RESEARCH Effective Date: Date Revised: N/A Supersedes: N/A Related Policies: Policy on Copyright (CA) Responsible Office/Department: Center for Research Innovation (CRI) Keywords: Patent, Intellectual

More information

Interactive Retainer Letter

Interactive Retainer Letter Interactive Retainer Letter General Notes on Retainer Agreements (Non-Contingency) Retainer letters are recommended practice in Alberta for non-contingency retainers. The Code of Conduct makes reference

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 104 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 104 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/2016 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 653767/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 104 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2016 1 of 10 Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Richter, Kahn, JJ. 787- Index 653767/13 788

More information

MARCHBANKS V. MCCULLOUGH, 1942-NMSC-066, 47 N.M. 13, 132 P.2d 426 (S. Ct. 1942) MARCHBANKS vs. McCULLOUGH

MARCHBANKS V. MCCULLOUGH, 1942-NMSC-066, 47 N.M. 13, 132 P.2d 426 (S. Ct. 1942) MARCHBANKS vs. McCULLOUGH 1 MARCHBANKS V. MCCULLOUGH, 1942-NMSC-066, 47 N.M. 13, 132 P.2d 426 (S. Ct. 1942) MARCHBANKS vs. McCULLOUGH No. 4730 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 1942-NMSC-066, 47 N.M. 13, 132 P.2d 426 November 17, 1942

More information

IMPORTANT NOTICE: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INSTALLING THE SOFTWARE: THIS LICENCE AGREEMENT (LICENCE) IS A LEGAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN

IMPORTANT NOTICE: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INSTALLING THE SOFTWARE: THIS LICENCE AGREEMENT (LICENCE) IS A LEGAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN Date: 1st April 2016 (1) Licensee (2) ICG Visual Imaging Limited Licence Agreement IMPORTANT NOTICE: PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE INSTALLING THE SOFTWARE: THIS LICENCE AGREEMENT (LICENCE) IS A LEGAL AGREEMENT

More information

Supplemental end user software license agreement terms

Supplemental end user software license agreement terms Terms of Service Docusign, Inc. Supplemental end user software license agreement terms These Supplemental Terms and Conditions (the "Terms") govern your ("Customer") use of the DocuSign Subscription Service,

More information

Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard

Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective. Michel Jaccard Technology transactions and outsourcing deals: a practitioner s perspective Michel Jaccard Overview Introduction : IT transactions specifics and outsourcing deals Typical content of an IT outsourcing agreement

More information

IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY WELLINGTON [2015] NZERA Wellington HUTT CITY COUNCIL Respondent

IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY WELLINGTON [2015] NZERA Wellington HUTT CITY COUNCIL Respondent IN THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY WELLINGTON [2015] NZERA Wellington 31 5547356 BETWEEN AND MAT BENNETT Applicant HUTT CITY COUNCIL Respondent Member of Authority: Representatives: Investigation Meeting:

More information

Exhaustive Training module for new Patent examiners

Exhaustive Training module for new Patent examiners Exhaustive Training module for new Patent examiners In continuation with last month's appointment of 9 examiners by the Indian Patent Office, 8 more candidates have now been appointed as examiners. All

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION LAKESOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-1877 v. Demand for Jury Trial WAL-MART STORES, INC. and

More information

Frank Meckes Partner. Languages German. English

Frank Meckes Partner. Languages German. English Frank Meckes Partner Qualifications Admission to the bar (Rechtsanwalt) 2002. Law studies at the Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg i. Br., Germany. University of Cooperative Education (Finance Centre),

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 18, 2011

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 18, 2011 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 18, 2011 DENISE JEREMIAH and TIMOTHY JEREMIAH v. WILLIAM BLALOCK Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marshall County No. 08-CV-120

More information

Kryptonite Authorized Reseller Program

Kryptonite Authorized Reseller Program Kryptonite Authorized Reseller Program Program Effective Date: January 1, 2018 until discontinued or suspended A Kryptonite Authorized Reseller is one that purchases Kryptonite branded products directly

More information

Who s On First? Understanding Insolvency. SFS Law Group Insolvency Insights. November 2008

Who s On First? Understanding Insolvency. SFS Law Group Insolvency Insights. November 2008 Attorney and Counselor at Law P.O. Box 77071 Charlotte, NC 28271-7000 Tel: 704-780-1544 Fax: 704-973-0043 dennis.odea@sfslawgroup.com www.sfslawgroup.com is the principal officer of the SFS Law Group.

More information

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents

Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents Loyola University Maryland Provisional Policies and Procedures for Intellectual Property, Copyrights, and Patents Approved by Loyola Conference on May 2, 2006 Introduction In the course of fulfilling the

More information

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/interim-models-gdpr-compliance-12jan18-en.pdf 2

https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/interim-models-gdpr-compliance-12jan18-en.pdf 2 ARTICLE 29 Data Protection Working Party Brussels, 11 April 2018 Mr Göran Marby President and CEO of the Board of Directors Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 12025 Waterfront

More information

U.S. Bank Natl. v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc NY Slip Op 32875(U) October 8, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge:

U.S. Bank Natl. v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc NY Slip Op 32875(U) October 8, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: U.S. Bank Natl. v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 32875(U) October 8, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650369/2013 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

Andrew Michael Diamond

Andrew Michael Diamond Andrew Michael Diamond PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 239 Warren Road Toronto, Ontario M4V 2S6 (416) 577-5707 amdiamond@adr.ca Member in good standing of the Law Society of Upper Canada Called to the Bar

More information

smb Doc 5802 Filed 02/19/19 Entered 02/19/19 15:05:04 Main Document Pg 1 of 8

smb Doc 5802 Filed 02/19/19 Entered 02/19/19 15:05:04 Main Document Pg 1 of 8 Pg 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY, et al CASE NO: 18-35672 CHAPTER 11 (Jointly Administered) IN THE UNITED

More information

Shafeeqa W. Giarratani

Shafeeqa W. Giarratani Shafeeqa W. Giarratani Office Managing Shareholder Austin 512-344-4723 shafeeqa.giarratani@ogletree.com Shafeeqa Giarratani is co-managing shareholder of the Austin office of Ogletree Deakins. She represents

More information

Why patents DO matter to YOUR business

Why patents DO matter to YOUR business Why patents DO matter to YOUR business Robynne Sanders & Eliza Mallon DLA Piper 18 March 2015 Overview This session will cover: how to identify when patent protection should be obtained to protect your

More information

Rose Lagram-Taylor. Insolvency and Restructuring. Called to the Bar (0)

Rose Lagram-Taylor. Insolvency and Restructuring. Called to the Bar (0) Rose Lagram-Taylor Called to the Bar 2016 +44 (0)20 7696 9900 roselagramtaylor@southsquare.com Rose has developed a broad practice across a range of Chambers areas of expertise since completing her pupillage

More information

Case 1:11-cr JSR Document 155 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:11-cr JSR Document 155 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:11-cr-00907-JSR Document 155 Filed 07/02/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -v- RAJAT K. GUPTA, 11 Cr. 907 (JSR) MEMORANDUM ORDER

More information

scc Doc 210 Filed 05/06/18 Entered 05/06/18 22:38:17 Main Document Pg 1 of 173

scc Doc 210 Filed 05/06/18 Entered 05/06/18 22:38:17 Main Document Pg 1 of 173 Pg 1 of 173 Hearing Date and Time: June 5, 2018, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) Objection Deadline: May 29, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. (prevailing Eastern Time) Thomas B. Walper (admitted pro hac

More information

Australian Census 2016 and Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA)

Australian Census 2016 and Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) http://www.privacy.org.au Secretary@privacy.org.au http://www.privacy.org.au/about/contacts.html 12 February 2016 Mr David Kalisch Australian Statistician Australian Bureau of Statistics Locked Bag 10,

More information

Identifying and Managing Joint Inventions

Identifying and Managing Joint Inventions Page 1, is a licensing manager at the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation in Madison, Wisconsin. Introduction Joint inventorship is defined by patent law and occurs when the outcome of a collaborative

More information

TERMS AND CONDITIONS. for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies

TERMS AND CONDITIONS. for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies TERMS AND CONDITIONS for the use of the IMDS Advanced Interface by IMDS-AI using companies Introduction The IMDS Advanced Interface Service (hereinafter also referred to as the IMDS-AI ) was developed

More information

Comments on Public Consultation on Proposed Changes to Singapore's Registered Designs Regime

Comments on Public Consultation on Proposed Changes to Singapore's Registered Designs Regime Mr. Simon Seow Director, IP Policy Division Ministry of Law 100 High Street, #08-02, The Treasury Singapore 179434 via email: Simon_Seow@mlaw.gov.sg Re: Comments on Public Consultation on Proposed Changes

More information

Elena R. Baca. Los Angeles. Orange County. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education

Elena R. Baca. Los Angeles. Orange County. Practice Areas. Admissions. Languages. Education Elena R. Baca Partner, Employment Law Department elenabaca@paulhastings.com Elena Baca is chair of Paul Hastings Los Angeles office and co-vice chair of the Employment Law practice. Ms. Baca is recognized

More information

CONSTITUTION OF PRIMROSE CHESS CLUB:

CONSTITUTION OF PRIMROSE CHESS CLUB: CONSTITUTION OF PRIMROSE CHESS CLUB: Title: The Club shall be known as the Primrose Chess Club, hereafter referred to as the Club. Mission: The Primrose Chess Club is a non-profit organization with the

More information

Cox Padmore Skolnik & Shakarchy LLP, New York (Noah B. Potter of counsel), for appellant respondent.

Cox Padmore Skolnik & Shakarchy LLP, New York (Noah B. Potter of counsel), for appellant respondent. 172 Van Duzer Realty Corp. v 878 Educ., LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 05957 Decided on September 8, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary

More information

United States Postal Service Law Department OPINION OF THE BOARD. The Postal Service awarded MBD Maintenance, LLC, a contract for construction

United States Postal Service Law Department OPINION OF THE BOARD. The Postal Service awarded MBD Maintenance, LLC, a contract for construction BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 2101 WILSON BOULEVARD, SUITE 600 ARLINGTON VA 22201-3078 703-812-1900 FAX: 703-812-1901 ) MBD MAINTENANCE, LLC, ) March 3, 2017 Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

More information

RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS 2001, REGULATION 8 - RECORD OF RADIO LICENCE

RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS 2001, REGULATION 8 - RECORD OF RADIO LICENCE RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS REGULATIONS 2001, REGULATION 8 - RECORD OF RADIO LICENCE 1. Licence details 1. Licence Type: General User Licence (Radio) (ZZ) General User Radio Licence for Amateur Radio Operators

More information

Protecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond

Protecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond Protecting Your Trade Secrets in Silicon Valley and Beyond Jeffrey D. Polsky, Esq., Partner, Fox Rothschild LLP May 8, 2017 1 Types of Intellectual Property Trademark a recognizable sign, design, or expression

More information

Guidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements

Guidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements Guidelines on Standardization and Patent Pool Arrangements Part 1 Introduction In industries experiencing innovation and technical change, such as the information technology sector, it is important to

More information

INTERNATIONAL. Building and Implementing an Information Governance Program in a Changing Legal Landscape

INTERNATIONAL. Building and Implementing an Information Governance Program in a Changing Legal Landscape Building and Implementing an Information Governance Program in a Changing Legal Landscape Building and Implementing an Information Governance Program in a Changing Legal Landscape Hon. Andrew J. Peck March

More information

Gypsy Statement of Limited Warranty. Part 1 General Terms

Gypsy Statement of Limited Warranty. Part 1 General Terms Gypsy Statement of Limited Warranty Part 1 General Terms This Statement of Limited Warranty includes Part 1 General Terms, and Part2 Warranty Information. The warranties provided by PROVO CRAFT AND NOVELTY,

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No."14(8030" PETER" METROU," Trustee" of" the" Bankruptcy" Estate" of" David" Matichak," Plaintiff(Appellant," v." M.A."MORTENSON"COMPANY"and"SCHUFF"STEEL"COMPANY,"

More information

Re: Review of Market and Social Research Privacy Code

Re: Review of Market and Social Research Privacy Code http://www.privacy.org.au Secretary@privacy.org.au http://www.privacy.org.au/about/contacts.html 31 August 2012 Dr Terry Beed Chair Independent Code Review Panel AMSRO Dear Terry Re: Review of Market and

More information

Richard M. Zielinski. Director. Accolades. Boston:

Richard M. Zielinski. Director. Accolades. Boston: Richard M. Zielinski Director rzielinski@goulstonstorrs.com Boston: +1 617 574 4029 Richard Zielinski is a nationally known bet the company trial lawyer who handles a wide range of complex, high-stakes

More information

================================================================= Date of the judgement

================================================================= Date of the judgement Date of the judgement 1986.10.03 Case Number 1986(O)454 Reporter Minshu Vol.40, No.6, at 1068 Title Judgment upon the case concerning the meaning of the 'preparation for business to work the invention'

More information

POLICY PHILOSOPHY DEFINITIONS AC.2.11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Programs and Curriculum. APPROVED: Chair, on Behalf of SAIT s Board of Governors

POLICY PHILOSOPHY DEFINITIONS AC.2.11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. Programs and Curriculum. APPROVED: Chair, on Behalf of SAIT s Board of Governors Section: Subject: Academic/Student (AC) Programs and Curriculum AC.2.11 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Legislation: Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c.c-42); Patent Act (R.S.C., 1985, c.p-4); Trade-marks Act (R.S.C.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No (RMC) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No (RMC) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLORADO WILD HORSE AND BURRO COALITION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 10-1645 (RMC KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, Secretary, U.S. Department

More information

Terms and Conditions for the Use of the EZ-Reload by Card Facility

Terms and Conditions for the Use of the EZ-Reload by Card Facility EZ-Link Pte Ltd (Co. Reg. No. 200200086M) Terms and Conditions for the Use of the EZ-Reload by Card Facility 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 1.1 In these terms and conditions ( Terms and Conditions ),

More information

Jay A. Yurkiw. Partner

Jay A. Yurkiw. Partner Jay A. Yurkiw Jay litigates business disputes involving technology, intellectual property, financial services, and contract rights. He regularly advises clients on and litigates, copyright, covenant not

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. BBK Tobacco & Foods, LLP, an Arizona limited liability partnership, d/b/a HBI International, Case :-cv-0-fjm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 GRAIF BARRETT & MATURA, P.C. Kevin C. Barrett, State Bar No. 00 Jeffrey C. Matura, State Bar No. 0 0 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 00 Telephone:

More information

403(b) PLAN LITIGATION UPDATE

403(b) PLAN LITIGATION UPDATE 2018 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 403(b) PLAN LITIGATION UPDATE June 12, 2018 Overview of Pending 403(b) Plan Litigation Universities Sued to Date and Status 1. Columbia (MTD mostly denied) 2. Duke (MTD

More information

Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace

Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace [Billing Code: 6750-01-S] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION Public Hearings Concerning the Evolving Intellectual Property Marketplace AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice of Public Hearings SUMMARY:

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING ATTENTION: INDIVIDUALS WITH MOBILITY AND/OR SENSORY DISABILITIES WHO HAVE VISITED HOSPITALS, CLINICS OR OTHER PATIENT CARE FACILITIES AFFILIATED

More information

Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Best Practices

Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Best Practices Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Best Practices William W. Aylor M.S., J.D. Director, Technology Transfer Office Registered Patent Attorney Presentation Outline I. The Technology Transfer

More information

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS

THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT NEW POST-ISSUANCE PATENT OFFICE PROCEEDINGS By Sharon Israel and Kyle Friesen I. Introduction The recently enacted Leahy-Smith America Invents Act ( AIA ) 1 marks the most sweeping

More information

The plaintiff was allegedly encouraged to resign due to a questionable posting on

The plaintiff was allegedly encouraged to resign due to a questionable posting on Running Head: CASE STUDIES A-B 1 Case Studies A-B EPDS 553 Daniel Jay Cottell Case Study A: Payne v. Barrow County School District Date: August 2009 Plaintiff: Ashley Renee Payne Defendant: Barrow County

More information

World Trade Organization Panel Proceedings

World Trade Organization Panel Proceedings World Trade Organization Panel Proceedings Australia Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks, Geographical Indications and other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging

More information

Christopher D. Lonn. Member. Overview

Christopher D. Lonn. Member. Overview Christopher D. Lonn Member Overview Christopher D. Lonn is a Member of Jennings Strouss whose legal practice is focused on complex commercial litigation, arbitration and administrative law, with a specific

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. United States District Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. United States District Court Case :0-cv-00-MHP Document Filed 0//00 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 AMERICAN SMALL BUSINESS LEAGUE, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,

More information

19 Progressive Development of Protection Framework for Pharmaceutical Invention under the TRIPS Agreement Focusing on Patent Rights

19 Progressive Development of Protection Framework for Pharmaceutical Invention under the TRIPS Agreement Focusing on Patent Rights 19 Progressive Development of Protection Framework for Pharmaceutical Invention under the TRIPS Agreement Focusing on Patent Rights Research FellowAkiko Kato This study examines the international protection

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ORDER

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF WWW.DISRUPTJ20.0RG THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES OWNED, MAINTAINED, CONTROLLED, OR OPERA TED BY DREAMHOST Special Proceedings No.

More information

MPEP Breakdown Course

MPEP Breakdown Course MPEP Breakdown Course MPEP Chapter Worksheet The MPEP Breakdown training course will provide you with a clear vision of what the Patent Bar is all about along with many tips for passing it. It also covers

More information

Diana Gordick, Ph.D. 150 E Ponce de Leon, Suite 350 Decatur, GA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)

Diana Gordick, Ph.D. 150 E Ponce de Leon, Suite 350 Decatur, GA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Diana Gordick, Ph.D. 150 E Ponce de Leon, Suite 350 Decatur, GA 30030 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES I. COMMITMENT TO YOUR PRIVACY: DIANA GORDICK,

More information

2017 Laws of Duplicate Bridge. Summary of Significant changes

2017 Laws of Duplicate Bridge. Summary of Significant changes 2017 Laws of Duplicate Bridge Summary of Significant changes Summary list of significant changes Law 12, Director s Discretionary Powers Law 40, Partnership understandings Law 15, Wrong board or hand Law

More information

Michael F. Donner Partner

Michael F. Donner Partner A litigator with a leading national reputation, Michael specializes in the disposition and resolution of challenging commercial disputes. His practice is broad and encompasses numerous subject matter areas,

More information

MINISTRY OF HEALTH STAGE PROBITY REPORT. 26 July 2016

MINISTRY OF HEALTH STAGE PROBITY REPORT. 26 July 2016 MINISTRY OF HEALTH Request For Solution Outline (RFSO) Social Bonds Pilot Scheme STAGE PROBITY REPORT 26 July 2016 TressCox Lawyers Level 16, MLC Centre, 19 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000 Postal Address:

More information

Ethical Considerations When Using Freelance Legal Services

Ethical Considerations When Using Freelance Legal Services FEATURE TITLE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND LEGAL ETHICS Ethical Considerations When Using Freelance Legal Services BY SARAH COLEMAN Both freelance lawyers and hiring lawyers should address ethical issues before

More information

Warning a client of risks 1/2

Warning a client of risks 1/2 Legal English Warning a client of risks 1/2 Let me caution you that in this jurisdiction the fines can be very high for this sort of activity. I must warn you that individuals directly involved in serious

More information

LLOYDS BANKING GROUP MATTERS RESERVED TO THE BOARDS (LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC, LLOYDS BANK PLC, BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC & HBOS PLC)

LLOYDS BANKING GROUP MATTERS RESERVED TO THE BOARDS (LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC, LLOYDS BANK PLC, BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC & HBOS PLC) LLOYDS BANKING GROUP MATTERS RESERVED TO THE BOARDS (LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC, LLOYDS BANK PLC, BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC & HBOS PLC) LLOYDS BANKING GROUP PLC, LLOYDS BANK PLC, BANK OF SCOTLAND PLC & HBOS PLC

More information

Lawyers sued over advice to board

Lawyers sued over advice to board Lawyers sued over advice to board Misrepresentation, negligence Publicly held company Number of employees Over 1,000 Approximately $2 billion A large public company misstated its revenue during three quarters

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-1356 Selective Insurance Company of America, a New Jersey corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Smart Candle, LLC, a Minnesota

More information

JASON HUSGEN. St. Louis, MO office:

JASON HUSGEN. St. Louis, MO office: JASON HUSGEN Senior Counsel St. Louis, MO office: 314.480.1921 email: jason.husgen@ Overview Clever, thorough, and with a keen knowledge of the law, Jason tackles complex commercial disputes as part of

More information

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA

INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA IN THE MATTER OF: THE RULES OF THE INVESTMENT INDUSTRY REGULATORY ORGANIZATION OF CANADA (IIROC) AND GABRIEL KA LEUNG LEE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT I. INTRODUCTION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: June 12, 2012 Docket Nos. 31,156 & 30,862 (consolidated) LA MESA RACETRACK & CASINO, RACETRACK GAMING OPERATOR S LICENSE

More information

Independence - Freedom - Happiness. Hanoi, 20 March 1996

Independence - Freedom - Happiness. Hanoi, 20 March 1996 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Independence - Freedom - Happiness Hanoi, 20 March 1996 MINERAL LAW Being natural resources which are an important asset of the nation and which are generally

More information

Innovation Office. Intellectual Property at the Nelson Mandela University: A Brief Introduction. Creating value for tomorrow

Innovation Office. Intellectual Property at the Nelson Mandela University: A Brief Introduction. Creating value for tomorrow Innovation Office Creating value for tomorrow PO Box 77000 Nelson Mandela University Port Elizabeth 6031 South Africa www.mandela.ac.za Innovation Office Main Building Floor 12 041 504 4309 innovation@mandela.ac.za

More information

Xena Exchange Users Agreement

Xena Exchange Users Agreement Xena Exchange Users Agreement Last Updated: April 12, 2018 1. Introduction Xena Exchange welcomes You ( User ) to use Xena Exchange s online software ( Xena s Software ) described herein in accordance

More information

-and- (the Artist ) maquette means the drawing or model, prepared by the Artist, of the proposed Art Work;

-and- (the Artist ) maquette means the drawing or model, prepared by the Artist, of the proposed Art Work; THIS AGREEMENT made in triplicate this th day of, 200 BETWEEN: CITY OF OTTAWA (the City -and- (the Artist WHEREAS the Council of the former City of Ottawa, an old municipality as defined in the City of

More information

AN OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM

AN OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM AN OVERVIEW OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT SYSTEM (Note: Significant changes in United States patent law were brought about by legislation signed into law by the President on December 8, 1994. The purpose

More information

IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 37 APPLICANT RESPONDENT ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL

IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 37 APPLICANT RESPONDENT ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 37 BETWEEN ABH APPLICANT AND ZYV Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 28 May 2013 Referee: Referee A Davidson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that

More information

TIME RUNNING OUT? Outsource Your Paperwork, Case By Case. A Legal Writing And Research Service For California Lawyers.

TIME RUNNING OUT? Outsource Your Paperwork, Case By Case. A Legal Writing And Research Service For California Lawyers. TIME RUNNING OUT? Outsource Your Paperwork, Case By Case. A Legal Writing And Research Service For California Lawyers. Table of Contents 1 2 4 5 Why You Need Quo Jure Who Is Quo Jure? Services How It Works

More information

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property

F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property F98-3 (A.S. 1041) Page 1 of 7 F98-3 Intellectual/Creative Property Legislative History: At its meeting of October 5, 1998, the Academic Senate approved the following policy recommendation presented by

More information