West Norfolk CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 7 Internal Use Only
|
|
- Linette Mitchell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only 1
2 Background and objectives Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) need to have strong relationships with a range of health and care partners in order to be successful commissioners within the local system. These relationships provide CCGs with on-going information, advice and knowledge to help them make the best possible commissioning decisions. The CCG 360 o stakeholder survey is a key part of ensuring these strong relationships are in place. The survey allows stakeholders to provide feedback on working relationships with CCGs. The results from the survey will serve two purposes: 1. To provide a wealth of data for CCGs to help with their ongoing organisational development, enabling them to continue to build strong and productive relationships with stakeholders. The findings can provide a valuable tool for all CCGs to be able to evaluate their progress and inform their organisational decisions. 2. To feed into assurance conversations between NHS England Area Teams and CCGs. The survey will form part of the evidence used to assess whether the stakeholder relationships, forged during the transition through authorisation, continue to be central to the effective commissioning of services by CCGs, and in doing so, improve quality and outcomes for patients. 2
3 Methodology and technical details It was the responsibility of each CCG to provide the list of stakeholders to invite to take part in the CCG 360 o stakeholder survey. CCGs were provided with a core list of stakeholder organisations (outlined in the table opposite) to be included in their stakeholder list. Beyond this however, CCGs had flexibility to determine which individual within each organisation was the most appropriate to nominate. Core stakeholder framework GP member practices Other CCGs Health and wellbeing boards One from every member practice Up to five Up to two per HWB They were also given the opportunity to add up to seven additional stakeholders they wanted to include locally (they are referred to in this report as Wider stakeholders ). These included: Commissioning Support Units, Health Education England, lower tier LAs, MPs, private providers, Public Health England, social care / community organisations, voluntary / third sector organisations and other stakeholders and clinicians. The survey was conducted primarily online via invitations. Stakeholders who did not respond to the invitation, and stakeholders for whom an address was not provided, were telephoned by an Ipsos MORI interviewer who encouraged response and offered the opportunity to complete the survey by telephone. Upper tier or unitary local authorities Local Healthwatch Other patient groups NHS providers Acute NHS providers Mental health trusts NHS providers Community health trusts Up to five per LA One per local Healthwatch Up to three Up to two from each provider Up to two from each provider Up to two from each provider 3
4 Methodology and technical details Within the survey, stakeholders were asked a series of questions about their working relationship with the CCG. In addition, to reflect each core stakeholder group s different area of expertise and knowledge, they were presented with a short section of questions specific to the stakeholder group they represent. Fieldwork was conducted between 12 March 2014 and 8 April of the CCG s stakeholders completed the survey. The overall response rate was 80% which varied across the stakeholder groups shown in the table opposite. Survey response rates for Stakeholder group Invited to take part in survey Completed survey Response rate GP member practices % Health and wellbeing boards % Local Healthwatch/patient groups % NHS providers % Other CCGs % Upper tier or unitary local authorities % Wider stakeholders % 4
5 Interpreting the results For each question, the responses to each answer are presented both as a percentage (%) and the number of stakeholders giving a certain answer, which are included in brackets (n). The number of stakeholders answering (the base size) is stated for each question. The total number of responses is shown at the bottom of each chart and in every table. For questions with fewer than 30 stakeholders answering, we strongly recommend that you look at the number of stakeholders giving each response rather than the percentage, as the percentage can be misleading when based on so few stakeholders. This report presents the results from 's stakeholder survey. Throughout the report, the CCG / your CCG refers to. Where a result for the Area team is presented, this refers to the overall score across East Anglia Area Team. Where results do not sum to 100%, or where individual responses (e.g. tend to agree; strongly agree) do not sum to combined responses (e.g. strongly/tend to agree) this is due to rounding. 5
6 Using the results the reports The results of the CCG 360 degree stakeholder survey are presented for each CCG in two separate reports a summary report and a main report. The summary report shows the results at CCG level for the questions asked of all stakeholders (i.e. only those in section 1 of the questionnaire). This report provides CCGs with an at a glance visual summary of the results for the key questions, including direction of travel comparisons where appropriate. The main report shows the results for all questions in the survey including any local questions where CCGs included them. The results for each question are provided at CCG level with a breakdown also shown for each of the core stakeholder groups where relevant. This report allows CCGs to interrogate the data in more detail. The main report has been structured by the six assurance domains. There is also an additional initial section on overall engagement and relationships which contains the general questions that are not linked to specific domains. At the end of each section of the main report, there is a table summarising the results, along with some comparative data for those questions asked of all stakeholders. 6
7 Using the results comparisons For some questions, data has been included in the reports to compare the results for the CCG with: The combined national CCG average in 2014 The 2014 average across all CCGs in the CCG s Area Team The CCG s result in 2012 The comparisons are included to provide a rough headline guide only and should be treated with caution due to the low numbers of respondents and differences in stakeholder lists. Any differences are not necessarily statistically significant differences; a higher score than the Area Team average does not always equate to better performance, and a higher score than in 2012 does not necessarily mean the CCG has improved. The comparisons offer a starting point to inform wider discussions about the CCG s ongoing organisational development and its relationships with stakeholders. For example, they may indicate areas in which stakeholders think the CCG is performing relatively less well, for the CCG to discuss internally and externally to identify what improvements can be made in this area, if any. 7
8 Overall engagement and relationships 8
9 Overall, to what extent, if at all, do you feel you have been engaged by the CCG over the past 12 months? All stakeholders 2 By stakeholder group 6 5% 11 Stakeholder group Base Great deal / Fair amount Not very much / Not at all 14% 25% GP member practices 18 83% (15) 17% (3) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 100% (4) -% (0) 57% 25 A great deal A fair amount Not very much Not at all Don't know Other CCGs 8 75% (6) 25% (2) Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 75% (3) 25% (1) Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) 40% (2) 82% (36) 2014 Great deal / Fair amount 77% (40) *2012 Great deal / Fair amount * 2012 question wording: Overall, to what extent, if at all, do you feel you have been engaged by the CCG? Total responses : All stakeholders (2014: 44); (2012: 52) 9
10 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the way in which the CCG has engaged with you over the past 12 months? All stakeholders who have been engaged by the CCG 2 1 5% 2% % 31% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Very / Fairly satisfied Very / Fairly dissatisfied GP member practices 16 69% (11) 13% (2) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 75% (3) -% (0) 48% Other CCGs 8 75% (6) 13% (1) 20 Very satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Fairly satisfied Fairly dissatisfied Don't know Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Wider stakeholders 5 80% (4) -% (0) 79% (33) 2014 Very satisfied / Fairly satisfied 71% (36) *2012 Very satisfied / Fairly satisfied * 2012 question wording: How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the way in which the CCG has engaged with you so far? Total responses : All stakeholders who say they have been engaged by CCG (2014: 42); (2012: 51) 10
11 Still thinking about the past 12 months, to what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG has listened to your views where you have provided them? All stakeholders % 5% 1 7% 2% 11 25% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 67% (12) 22% (4) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) 52% 23 Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree I have not given any views Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know NHS providers 4 50% (2) -% (0) Other CCGs 8 88% (7) 13% (1) Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Wider stakeholders 5 80% (4) -% (0) 77% (34) 2014 Strongly agree / Tend to agree 71% (37) *2012 Strongly agree / Tend to agree * 2012 question wording: To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG has listened to your views where you have provided them? Total responses : All stakeholders (2014: 44); (2012: 52) 11
12 To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG has acted on your suggestions? All stakeholders 3 3 7% 7% 3 7% 2 5% 16% 7 By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 56% (10) 22% (4) Health and wellbeing boards 1 -% (0) -% (0) 11 25% 34% 15 Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 50% (2) -% (0) NHS providers 4 25% (1) -% (0) Other CCGs 8 50% (4) 13% (1) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree I have not given any suggestions Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 50% (2) -% (0) Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) -% (0) 50% (22) 2014 Strongly agree / Tend to agree 63% (33) 2012 Strongly agree / Tend to agree Total responses : All stakeholders (2014: 44); (2012: 52) 12
13 Overall, how would you rate your working relationship with the CCG? All stakeholders 3 1 2% 7% 7 16% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Very good / Fairly good Very poor / Fairly poor GP member practices 18 61% (11) 22% (4) 45% 20 Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) 30% NHS providers 4 75% (3) -% (0) 13 Other CCGs 8 75% (6) -% (0) Very good Neither good nor poor Very poor I/we do not have a working relationship Fairly good Fairly poor Don't know Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Wider stakeholders 5 80% (4) -% (0) 75% (33) 2014 Very good / Fairly good 83% (43) 2012 Very good / Fairly good Total responses : All stakeholders (2014: 44); (2012: 52) 13
14 Thinking back over the past 12 months, would you say your working relationship with the CCG has got better, got worse or has it stayed about the same? All stakeholders who say they have a working relationship with the CCG % 9% 20% By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Got much / A little better Got much / A little worse GP member practices 18 33% (6) 22% (4) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) 17 39% 27% 12 NHS providers 4 75% (3) 25% (1) Other CCGs 8 25% (2) 13% (1) Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 75% (3) -% (0) Got much better Stayed about the same Got much worse Got a little better Got a little worse Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 40% (2) -% (0) Total responses : All stakeholders who say they have a working relationship with the CCG (44) 14
15 Engagement and relationships: Summary Overall, to what extent, if at all, do you feel you have been engaged by the CCG over the past 12 months? And how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the way in which the CCG has engaged with you over the past 12 months? Still thinking about the past 12 months, to what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG has listened to your views where you have provided them? To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG has acted on your suggestions? Overall, how would you rate your working relationship with the CCG? Thinking back over the past 12 months, would you say your working relationship with the CCG has got better, got worse or has it stayed about the same? 82% (36) a great deal / a fair amount 79% (33) very / fairly satisfied 77% (34) strongly / tend to agree 50% (22) strongly / tend to agree 75% (33) very / fairly good 48% (21) much better / a little better Base All stakeholders (44) All stakeholders who have been engaged (42) All stakeholders (44) All stakeholders (44) All stakeholders (44) All stakeholders who say they have a working relationship with the CCG (44) 15
16 Engagement and relationships: CCG comparisons The CCG 2012 The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team Engagement Overall, to what extent, if at all, do you feel you have been engaged by the CCG over the past 12 months? Percentage of stakeholders saying a fair amount / a great deal Most stakeholders say that they have been engaged either a great deal or a fair amount. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base 2012: All stakeholders (52) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) Satisfaction with engagement How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the way in which the CCG has engaged with you over the past 12 months? Percentage of stakeholders saying very / fairly satisfied The majority of stakeholders who say they have been engaged feel satisfied (fairly or very) with the way they have been engaged by the CCG. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders who (42) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders who (398) Base 2012: say they have been (51) Base national average: say they have been (8852) engaged engaged All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 16
17 Engagement and relationships: CCG comparisons The CCG 2012 The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team Listening to views Still thinking about the past 12 months, to what extent, do you agree or disagree that the CCG has listened to your views where you have provided them? Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree The majority of stakeholders say that the CCG has listened to their views. This is higher than the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base 2012: All stakeholders (52) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) Acting on suggestions To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG has acted on your suggestions? Around half of stakeholders say that the CCG has acted on their suggestions where they have provided them. Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base 2012: All stakeholders (52) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 17
18 Engagement and relationships: CCG comparisons The CCG 2012 The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team Working relationship Overall, how would you rate your working relationship with the CCG? The majority of stakeholders say that they have a good working relationship with the CCG. Percentage of stakeholders saying very good / fairly good This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base 2012: All stakeholders (52) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) Change in working relationship Thinking back over the past 12 months, would you say your working relationship with the CCG has got better, got worse or has it stayed about the same? Percentage of stakeholders saying got much better / got a little better Around half of stakeholders say that their working relationship with the CCG has got better over the past 12 months. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders who say (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders who say (399) they have a working Base national average: they have a working (8881) relationship with the CCG relationship with the CCG All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 18
19 Domain 1: Are patients receiving clinically commissioned, high quality services? 19
20 How effective, if at all, would you say the arrangements are for member participation and decision-making in your CCG? All member practices 3 17% 5 28% 61% (11) Very / Fairly effective % 78% (18) Very / Fairly effective % 6 Very effective Fairly effective Not very effective Not at all effective Don't know Total responses : All member practices (2014:18); (2012: 23) 20
21 How involved, if at all, do you feel you are in your CCG s decision making process? All member practices % 17% 3 17% 44% 8 Very involved Fairly involved Not very involved Not at all involved Don't know Total responses : All member practices (18) 21
22 How confident are you, if at all, in the systems to sustain two-way accountability between your CCG and its member practices in the CCG? All member practices 3 17% 5 28% 3 17% 67% (12) 74% (17) Very / Fairly confident 2014 Very / Fairly confident % 7 Very confident Fairly confident Not very confident Not at all confident Don't know Total responses : All member practices (2014: 18); (2012: 23) 22
23 Approximately how often, if at all, do you have the opportunity for direct discussions with your CCG s leaders? All member practices Number Weekly 11% 2 Twice a month 0% 0 Once a month 33% 6 Quarterly 44% 8 Twice a year 6% 1 Once a year 0% 0 Less than once a year 6% 1 Don't know 0% 0 Total responses : All member practices (18) 23
24 To what extent do you agree or disagree that representatives from member practices are able to take a leadership role within the CCG if they want to? All member practices 1 3 6% 17% 44% % 22% 4 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses : All member practices (18) 24
25 To what extent do you agree or disagree that quality is a key focus of your contracts with the CCG? All NHS providers 100% 4 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses : All NHS providers (4) 25
26 How involved, if at all, would you say clinicians from the CCG are in discussions about? Quality All NHS providers 1 25% 75% 3 Very involved Fairly involved Not very involved Not at all involved Don't know Total responses : All NHS providers (4) 26
27 How involved, if at all, would you say clinicians from the CCG are in discussions about? Service redesign All NHS providers 1 25% 75% 3 Very involved Fairly involved Not very involved Not at all involved Don't know Total responses : All NHS providers (4) 27
28 Domain 1: Summary How effective, if at all, would you say the arrangements are for member participation and decision-making in your CCG? How involved, if at all, do you feel you are in your CCG s decision-making process? How confident are you, if at all, in the systems to sustain two-way accountability between your CCG and its member practices in the CCG? To what extent do you agree or disagree that representatives from member practices are able to take a leadership role within the CCG if they want to? To what extent do you agree or disagree that quality is a key focus of your contracts with your CCG? How involved, if at all, would you say clinicians from the CCG are in discussions about? A. Quality B. Service redesign 61% (11) very / fairly effective 61% (11) very / fairly involved 67% (12) very / fairly confident 67% (12) strongly / tend to agree 100% (4) strongly / tend to agree 75% (3) very / fairly involved 75% (3) very / fairly involved Base All member practices (18) All member practices (18) All member practices (18) All member practices (18) All NHS providers (4) All NHS providers (4) 28
29 Domain 2: Are patients and the public actively engaged and involved? 29
30 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? All stakeholders Number Strongly agree / Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree / Tend to disagree Don't know The CCG involves and engages with the right individuals and organisations when making commissioning decisions 55% 16% 16% 14% I have confidence in the CCG to commission high quality services for the local population 66% 11% 16% 7% I understand the reasons for the decisions that the CCG makes when commissioning services 61% 14% 18% 7% The CCG effectively communicates its commissioning decisions with me 68% 20% 11% The CCG's plans will deliver continuous improvement in quality within the available resources 45% 27% 16% 11% Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 30
31 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? The CCG involves and engages with the right individuals and organisations when making commissioning decisions All stakeholders By stakeholder group By stakeholder group % 25% 11 Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 56% (10) 22% (4) 7% Health and wellbeing boards 1 -% (0) -% (0) 4 9% Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 75% (3) -% (0) 16% 30% NHS providers 4 25% (1) 25% (1) 7 13 Other CCGs 8 38% (3) 13% (1) Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 75% (3) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 80% (4) 20% (1) Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 31
32 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? I have confidence in the CCG to commission high quality services for the local population All stakeholders 4 9% 3 7% 3 7% 36% 16 By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 61% (11) 33% (6) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) 5 11% Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 50% (2) -% (0) 30% Other CCGs 8 50% (4) -% (0) 13 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) 20% (1) Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 32
33 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? I understand the reasons for the decisions that the CCG makes when commissioning services All stakeholders By stakeholder group 5 11% 3 7% 30% 13 Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 67% (12) 28% (5) 3 7% Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) 6 14% NHS providers 4 25% (1) 50% (2) 32% Other CCGs 8 38% (3) -% (0) 14 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 40% (2) 20% (1) Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 33
34 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? The CCG effectively communicates its commissioning decisions with me All stakeholders 4 1 2% 9% 11 25% By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 61% (11) 17% (3) 9 20% Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 75% (3) -% (0) 43% Other CCGs 8 50% (4) 13% (1) 19 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) 20% (1) Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 34
35 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? The CCG s plans will deliver continuous improvement in quality within the available resources All stakeholders 5 9 By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree 3 7% 11% 20% GP member practices 18 50% (9) 33% (6) 4 9% Health and wellbeing boards 1 -% (0) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 75% (3) -% (0) 27% 25% 11 NHS providers 4 50% (2) -% (0) Other CCGs 8 13% (1) -% (0) 12 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 50% (2) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) 20% (1) Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 35
36 How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the steps taken by the CCG to engage with patients and the public? All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders % 25% 50% 2 Very satisfied Fairly satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Fairly dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Don't know Total responses : All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 36
37 To what extent, if at all, do you feel that the CCG has engaged with seldom heard groups? All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders % 25% 50% 2 A great deal A fair amount Just a little Not at all Don't know Total responses : All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 37
38 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders Number Strongly agree / Tend to agree Strongly disagree / Tend to disagree Neither agree nor disagree Don't know The CCG s commissioning decisions are open and transparent so patients and the public are able to understand how decisions have been made if they want to 75% 25% Patients and the public have the opportunity to input into the CCG s commissioning decisions 100% Total responses : All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 38
39 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? The CCG s commissioning decisions are open and transparent so patients and the public are able to understand how decisions have been made if they want to All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders 1 25% 50% 2 25% 1 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses : All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 39
40 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Patients and the public have the opportunity to input into the CCG s commissioning decisions All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders 1 25% 75% 3 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses : All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 40
41 To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG listens to and acts on any concerns, complaints or issues that are raised? All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders 1 25% 75% 3 Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses : All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 41
42 Domain 2: Summary Base To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? All stakeholders (44) A. The CCG involves and engages with the right individuals and organisations when making commissioning decisions B. I have confidence in the CCG to commission high quality services for the local population C. I understand the reasons for the decisions that the CCG makes when commissioning services D. The CCG effectively communicates its commissioning decisions with me E. The CCG s plans will deliver continuous improvement in quality within the available resources 55% (24) strongly / tend to agree 66% (29) strongly / tend to agree 61% (27) strongly / tend to agree 68% (30) strongly / tend to agree 45% (20) strongly / tend to agree How satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the steps taken by the CCG to engage with patients and the public? To what extent, if at all, do you feel that the CCG has engaged with seldom heard groups? 75% (3) very / fairly satisfied 75% (3) a great deal / a fair amount All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 42
43 Domain 2: Summary To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? A. The CCG s commissioning decisions are open and transparent so patients and the public are able to understand how decisions have been made if they want to B. Patients and the public have the opportunity to input into the CCG s commissioning decisions 75% (3) strongly / tend to agree 100% (4) strongly / tend to agree Base All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the CCG listens to and acts on any concerns, complaints or issues that are raised? 100% (4) strongly / tend to agree All Healthwatch and patient group stakeholders (4) 43
44 Domain 2: CCG comparisons The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? Involving and engaging the right individuals and organisations The CCG involves and engages with the right individuals and organisations when making commissioning decisions Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree Around half of stakeholders say that the CCG involves and engages with the right individuals and organisations when making commissioning decisions. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) High quality services I have confidence in the CCG to commission high quality services for the local population The majority of stakeholders say that they have confidence in the CCG to commission high quality services for the local population. Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall. Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 44
45 Domain 2: CCG comparisons The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? Understanding of commissioning decisions I understand the reasons for the decisions that the CCG makes when commissioning services Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree The majority of stakeholders say that they understand the reasons for the decisions that the CCG makes. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) Communicating commissioning decisions The CCG effectively communicates its commissioning decisions with me The majority of stakeholders say that the CCG effectively communicates its commissioning decisions. Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall. Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 45
46 Domain 2: CCG comparisons The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG commissions services? Continuous improvement in quality The CCG s plans will deliver continuous improvement in quality within the available resources Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree Around half of stakeholders agree that the CCG s plans will deliver continuous improvement in quality within available resources. This is lower than the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 46
47 Domain 3: Are CCG plans delivering better outcomes for patients? 47
48 How much would you say you know about the CCG s plans and priorities? All stakeholders By stakeholder group % 2% 32% 14 Stakeholder group Base Great deal/ Fair amount Not very much/ Nothing at all GP member practices 18 67% (12) 33% (6) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 75% (3) 25% (1) 39% Other CCGs 8 38% (3) 63% (5) 17 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Wider stakeholders 5 80% (4) 20% (1) A great deal A fair amount Not very much Nothing at all Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 48
49 To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? All stakeholders / All stakeholders except member practices Strongly agree / Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree / Tend to disagree Don't know Number I have been given the opportunity to influence the CCG s plans and priorities 66% 18% 14% 2% When I have commented on the CCG s plans and priorities I feel that my comments have been taken on board 50% 30% 11% 9% *The CCG has effectively communicated its plans and priorities to me 65% 27% 8% The CCG s plans and priorities are the right ones 55% 30% 9% 7% Total responses : All stakeholders (44); *All stakeholders except member practices (26) 49
50 To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? I have been given the opportunity to influence the CCG s plans and priorities All stakeholders By stakeholder group 4 9% 2 1 5% 2% 30% 13 By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 72% (13) 17% (3) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) 8 18% Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 75% (3) 25% (1) 36% Other CCGs 8 13% (1) 13% (1) 16 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) 20% (1) Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 50
51 To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? When I have commented on the CCG s plans and priorities I feel that my comments have been taken on board All stakeholders 2 3 5% 7% 4 9% 13 30% By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 61% (11) 22% (4) Health and wellbeing boards 1 -% (0) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 75% (3) -% (0) 13 30% 20% NHS providers 4 50% (2) -% (0) Other CCGs 8 13% (1) -% (0) 9 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 50% (2) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) 20% (1) Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 51
52 To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? The CCG has effectively communicated its plans and priorities to me All stakeholders except member practices 2 5 8% 19% By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) 7 27% Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 75% (3) 25% (1) Other CCGs 8 25% (2) -% (0) 46% Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) 12 Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) 20% (1) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Total responses : All stakeholders except member practices (26) 52
53 To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? The CCG s plans and priorities are the right ones All stakeholders % 7% 11 25% 2% By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly/Tend to agree Strongly/Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 61% (11) 22% (4) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 75% (3) -% (0) 13 30% 30% NHS providers 4 50% (2) -% (0) Other CCGs 8 13% (1) -% (0) 13 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 75% (3) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Total responses : All stakeholders (44) Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 60% (3) -% (0) 53
54 How well, if at all, would you say you understand? All member practices Number Very well / Fairly well Not very well / Not at all well Don't know The financial implications of the CCG s plans 72% 22% 6% The implications of the CCG s plans for service improvement 61% 33% 6% The referral and activity implications of the CCG s plans 61% 33% 6% Total responses : All member practices (18) 54
55 How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? The financial implications of the CCG s plans All member practices % 11% 6% 5 28% 72% (13) 57% (13) Very / Fairly well 2014 Very / Fairly well % 8 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses : All member practices (2014: 18); (2012: 23) 55
56 How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? The implications of the CCG s plans for service improvement All member practices 1 6% 4 22% 33% 6 61% (11) Very / Fairly well % (14) Very / Fairly well % 28% 5 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses : All member practices (2014: 18); (2012: 23) 56
57 How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? The referral and activity implications of the CCG s plans All member practices 1 6% 4 22% 33% 6 61% (11) Very / Fairly well % (16) Very / Fairly well % 28% 5 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses : All member practices (2014: 18); (2012: 23) 57
58 How well, if at all, do you understand what is required of your practice in order to implement the CCG s plans? All member practices 1 6% % 33% 67% (12) Very well / Fairly well % (16) Very well / Fairly well % 6 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses : All member practices (2014: 18); (2012: 23) 58
59 How well, if at all, would you say the CCG and your organisation are working together to develop long-term strategies and plans? All NHS providers 25% % Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses : All NHS providers (4) 59
60 How well, if at all, would you say the CCG understands the challenges facing your provider organisation? All NHS providers % 25% 50% 2 Very well Fairly well Not very well Not at all well Don't know Total responses : All NHS providers (4) 60
61 Domain 3: Summary How much would you say you know about the CCG s plans and priorities? To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? 70% (31) a great deal / a fair amount Base All stakeholders (44) A. I have been given the opportunity to influence the CCG s plans and priorities B. When I have commented on the CCG s plans and priorities I feel that my comments have been taken on board C. The CCG has effectively communicated its plans and priorities to me D. The CCG s plans and priorities are the right ones How well, if at all, would you say that you understand? A. The financial implications of the CCG s plans B. The implications of the CCG s plans for service improvement C. The referral and activity implications of the CCG s plans 66% (29) strongly / tend to agree All stakeholders (44) 50% (22) strongly / tend to agree 65% (17) strongly / tend to agree 55% (24) strongly / tend to agree 72% (13) very well / fairly well 61% (11) very well / fairly well 61% (11) very well / fairly well All stakeholders (44) All stakeholders except member practices (26) All stakeholders (44) All member practices (18) How well, if at all, do you understand what is required of your practice in order to implement the CCG s plans? How well, if at all, would you say the CCG and your organisation are working together to develop long-term strategies and plans? How well, if at all, would you say the CCG understands the challenges facing your provider organisation? 67% (12) very well / fairly well 100% (4) very well / fairly well 75% (3) very well / fairly well All member practices (18) All NHS providers (4) All NHS providers (4) 61
62 Domain 3: CCG comparisons The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team Knowledge of plans and priorities How much would you say you know about the CCG s plans and priorities? Percentage of stakeholders saying a great deal / a fair amount The majority of stakeholders say that they know a great deal or a fair amount about the CCG s plans and priorities. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? Influence over the CCG s plans and priorities I have been given the opportunity to influence the CCG s plans and priorities Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree The majority of stakeholders say that they have been given the opportunity to influence the CCG s plans and priorities. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 62
63 Domain 3: CCG comparisons The CCG 2014 National CCG average 2014 CCG Area Team To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements about the CCG s plans and priorities? Taking comments on board When I have commented on the CCG s plans and priorities I feel that my comments have been taken on board Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree Around half of stakeholders say that they feel the CCG takes on board their comments on the plans and priorities. This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) The right plans and priorities The CCG s plans and priorities are the right ones Around half of stakeholders agree that the CCG s plans and priorities are the right ones. Percentage of stakeholders saying strongly agree / tend to agree This is about the same as the finding for CCGs overall Base 2014: All stakeholders (44) Base CCG Area Team: All stakeholders (406) Base national average: All stakeholders (9018) All comparisons are indicative only and do not imply statistical significance 63
64 Domain 4: Does the CCG have robust governance arrangements? 64
65 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of commissioned services? All stakeholders Number Strongly agree / Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree / Tend to disagree Don't know I have confidence that the CCG effectively monitors the quality of the services it commissions 68% 11% 7% 14% If I had concerns about the quality of local services I would feel able to raise my concerns with the CCG 84% 5% 7% 5% I have confidence in the CCG to act on feedback it receives about the quality of services 77% 7% 9% 7% Total responses : All stakeholders (44) 65
66 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of commissioned services? I have confidence that the CCG effectively monitors the quality of the services it commissions All stakeholders 6 By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree 2 14% GP member practices 18 61% (11) 17% (3) 5 1 5% 2% 11% 41% 18 Health and wellbeing boards 1 -% (0) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 100% (4) -% (0) 27% Other CCGs 8 75% (6) -% (0) 12 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 75% (3) -% (0) Strongly agree Tend to agree Neither agree nor disagree Tend to disagree Strongly disagree Don't know Total responses : All stakeholders (44) Wider stakeholders 5 40% (2) -% (0) 66
67 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of commissioned services? If I had concerns about the quality of local services I would feel able to raise my concerns with the CCG All stakeholders % 2% 5% 5% By stakeholder group By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 78% (14) 17% (3) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) 13 30% 55% 24 Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 100% (4) -% (0) Other CCGs 8 75% (6) -% (0) Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Total responses : All stakeholders (44) Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 80% (4) -% (0) 67
68 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of commissioned services? I have confidence in the CCG to act on feedback it receives about the quality of services All stakeholders By stakeholder group % 2% 7% 3 7% 41% 18 By stakeholder group Stakeholder group Base Strongly / Tend to agree Strongly / Tend to disagree GP member practices 18 67% (12) 22% (4) Health and wellbeing boards 1 100% (1) -% (0) Local Healthwatch/patient groups 4 100% (4) -% (0) NHS providers 4 75% (3) -% (0) 36% Other CCGs 8 75% (6) -% (0) 16 Upper tier/unitary local authorities 4 100% (4) -% (0) Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree Total responses : All stakeholders (44) Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Wider stakeholders 5 80% (4) -% (0) 68
69 Would you say that the amount of monitoring the CCG carries out on the quality of your services is too much, too little or about right? All NHS providers 1 25% 75% 3 Too much About right Too little Don't know Total responses : All NHS providers (4) 69
70 To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When there is an issue with the quality of services, the response of the CCG is proportionate and fair All NHS providers 1 25% 50% 2 25% 1 Strongly agree Neither agree nor disagree Strongly disagree There has never been an issue with the quality of services Tend to agree Tend to disagree Don't know Total responses : All NHS providers (4) 70
71 Domain 4: Summary Base To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the way in which the CCG monitors and reviews the quality of commissioned services? All stakeholders (44) A. I have confidence that the CCG effectively monitors the quality of the services it commissions B. If I had concerns about the quality of local services I would feel able to raise my concerns with the CCG C. I have confidence in the CCG to act on feedback it receives about the quality of services 68% (30) strongly / tend to agree 84% (37) strongly / tend to agree 77% (34) strongly / tend to agree Would you say that the amount of monitoring the CCG carries out on the quality of your services is too much, too little or about right? To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When there is an issue with the quality of services, the response of the CCG is proportionate and fair 25% (1) about right All NHS providers (4) 50% (2) strongly / tend to agree All NHS providers (4) 71
Enfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Background and objectives Slide 4 Methodology and technical details Slide 6 Interpreting the results
More informationOxfordshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Background and objectives Slide 4 Methodology and technical details Slide 6 Interpreting the results
More informationSouthern Derbyshire CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Background and objectives Slide 4 Methodology and technical details Slide 6 Interpreting the results
More informationSouth Devon and Torbay CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Background and objectives Slide 4 Methodology and technical details Slide 6 Interpreting the results Slide 7 Using the results
More informationPortsmouth CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Background and objectives Slide 4 Methodology and technical details Slide 6 Interpreting the results
More informationSutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2015 Main report Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Background and objectives Slide 4 Methodology and technical details Slide 6 Interpreting the results
More informationSutton CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 36 o stakeholder survey 214 Summary report Version 1 Internal Use Only 13-98464-1 Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Background and objectives Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) need to have strong relationships
More informationEnfield CCG. CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report. Version 1 Internal Use Only Version 1 Internal Use Only
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Background and objectives Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) need to have strong relationships with a range of Clinical
More informationEastern Cheshire CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey
CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey 2017-18 Findings 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Summary Slide 6 Introduction Slide 7 Background and objectives Slide 8 Methodology and technical details Slide 10 Interpreting
More informationKernow CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey
CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey 2017-18 Findings 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Summary Slide 6 Introduction Slide 7 Background and objectives Slide 8 Methodology and technical details Slide 10 Interpreting
More informationSwindon CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey
CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey 2017-18 Findings 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Slide 6 Slide 7 Slide 8 Slide 10 Slide 11 Slide 13 Slide 36 Slide 40 Slide 43 Slide 46 Slide 58 Slide 65 Summary Introduction Background
More informationSouthwark CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey
CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey 2017-18 Findings 1 Table of contents Slide 3 Summary Slide 6 Introduction Slide 7 Background and objectives Slide 8 Methodology and technical details Slide 10 Interpreting
More informationRushcliffe CCG CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey
CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey 207-8 Findings Table of contents Slide 3 Summary Slide 6 Introduction Slide 7 Background and objectives Slide 8 Methodology and technical details Slide 0 Interpreting the results
More informationCCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey
July 2017 CCG 360 o Stakeholder Survey National report NHS England Publications Gateway Reference: 06878 Ipsos 16-072895-01 Version 1 Internal Use Only MORI This Terms work was and carried Conditions out
More informationTrafford CCG. CCG authorisation 360 o stakeholder survey report. Version 18 Internal Use Only Version 14 Internal Use Only
Trafford CCG CCG authorisation 360 o stakeholder survey report Version 18 Internal Use Only 1 Background and objectives In April 2012 the NHS Commissioning Board Authority (NHSCBA) published Clinical commissioning
More informationCCG 360 stakeholder survey 2017/18 National report NHS England Publications Gateway Reference: 08192
CCG 360 stakeholder survey 2017/18 National report NHS England Publications Gateway Reference: 08192 CCG 360 stakeholder survey 2017/18 National report Version 1 PUBLIC 1 CCG 360 stakeholder survey 2017/18
More information3. Title NHSE & Ipsos Mori CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey
1. Record Type? 2. Unique Number Reassessment R00423 3. Title NHSE & Ipsos Mori CCG 360 Stakeholder Survey 4. Collection Type National 5. Other Reference 6. Description CCGs need to have strong relationships
More informationGOVERNING BOARD. 360 Stakeholder Survey Report. Date of Meeting 17 May 2017 Agenda Item No 9. Title
GOVERNING BOARD Date of Meeting 17 May 2017 Agenda Item No 9 Title 360 Stakeholder Survey Report Purpose of Paper To inform members of the Governing Board about the feedback NHS Portsmouth CCG received
More informationNHS NORTH & WEST READING CCG Latest survey results
C/16/02/13 NHS NORTH & WEST READING CCG Latest survey results January 2016 publication Version 1 Internal Use Only 1 Contents This slide pack provides results for the following topic areas: Background,
More informationCCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2017/18
CCG 360 o stakeholder survey 2017/18 Case studies of high performing and improved CCGs 1 Contents 1 Background and key themes 2 3 4 5 6 East and North Hertfordshire CCG: Building on a strong internal foundation
More informationNHS BATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET CCG Latest survey results
NHS BATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET CCG Latest survey results July 2016 publication Version 1 Public 1 Contents This slide pack provides results for the following topic areas: Background, introduction and
More informationNHS SUTTON CCG Latest survey results
NHS SUTTON CCG Latest survey results July 2016 publication Version 1 Public 1 Contents This slide pack provides results for the following topic areas: Background, introduction and guidance.... Slide 3
More informationNHS SOUTH NORFOLK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY
NHS SOUTH NORFOLK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP COMMUNICATIONS AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 2014-16 Ref Number: Version 3.0 Status FINAL DRAFT Author Oliver Cruickshank Approval body Governing Body Date Approved
More informationCCG Improvement and Assessment Framework 2016/17. Briefing Document
CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework 2016/17 Briefing Document 4 th April 2016 Executive Summary NHS England has launched a new Improvement and Assessment Framework for Clinical Commissioning Groups
More informationCity and Hackney CCG Clinical Governance Framework. Approved by the CCG Board November 2014
City and Hackney CCG Clinical Governance Framework Approved by the CCG Board November 2014 1 City and Hackney CCG Clinical Governance Framework Clinical Governance is the overarching framework through
More informationPatient and Community Engagement Indicator (Compliance with statutory guidance on patient and public participation in commissioning health and care)
Patient and Community Engagement Indicator (Compliance with statutory guidance on patient and public participation in commissioning health and care) 2018/19 CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework Guidance
More informationBoth strategies are available on the CCG s website:
Appendix 3.4 MEETING: Haringey Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body DATE: Thursday, 25 July 2013 TITLE: Communications and Engagement Strategy: update on progress LEAD DIRECTOR/ MANAGER: Jennie
More informationThe NHS England Assurance Framework: national report for consultation Chief Officer, Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group
Meeting Health and Well-Being Board Date 27 June 2013 Subject Report of Summary of item and decision being sought The NHS England Assurance Framework: national report for consultation Chief Officer, Barnet
More informationCCGs one year on: member engagement and primary care development. Ruth Robertson Holly Holder Laura Bennett Shilpa Ross Jennifer Gosling
CCGs one year on: member engagement and primary care development Ruth Robertson Holly Holder Laura Bennett Shilpa Ross Jennifer Gosling About this research Ongoing study by the Nuffield Trust and The King
More informationSouth West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy
South West Public Engagement Protocol for Wind Energy October 2004 South West Renewable Energy Agency Sterling House, Dix s Field, Exeter, EX1 1QA Tel: 01392 229394 Fax: 01392 229395 Email: admin@regensw.co.uk
More informationSAFEGUARDING ADULTS FRAMEWORK. Prevention and effective responses to neglect, harm and abuse is a basic requirement of modern health care services.
SAFEGUARDING ADULTS FRAMEWORK Introduction Prevention and effective responses to neglect, harm and abuse is a basic requirement of modern health care services. Safeguarding adults involves a range of additional
More informationCCG Assurance Framework. England
CCG Assurance Framework England NHS England INFORMATION READER BOX Directorate Medical Operations Patients and Information Nursing Policy Commissioning Development Finance Human Resources Publications
More informationNHS South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group. Governing Body. Agenda Item:
NHS South Tees Clinical Commissioning Group Governing Body Agenda Item: Wednesday, 18 th September 2013 Title Quarter 1 Assurance Report Responsible Officer Amanda Hume Author of the Report Craig Blair
More informationCheshire, Warrington and Wirral Area Team Commissioning for Value Pack
Cheshire, Warrington and Wirral Area Team Commissioning for Value Pack February 2014 NHS England Gateway ref: 00525 1 Contents Context 3 Introduction: The call to action.... 4 The approach Where to look
More informationGOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 25 April 2018 Agenda Item 3.2
GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 25 April 2018 Paper Title Paper Author(s) Jerry Hawker Accountable Officer NHS Eastern Cheshire CCG The Future of CCG Commissioning in Cheshire Alison Lee Accountable Officer
More informationCommunity Pharmacy Patient Questionnaire Results for Miltons Chemists
Community Pharmacy Patient Questionnaire Results for Miltons Chemists ST2 8BW Completed for 2016-2017 Patient Satisfaction Surveys processed by www.intellipharm.co.uk Summary of the information recorded
More informationREPORT ON THE EUROSTAT 2017 USER SATISFACTION SURVEY
EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate A: Cooperation in the European Statistical System; international cooperation; resources Unit A2: Strategy and Planning REPORT ON THE EUROSTAT 2017 USER SATISFACTION
More informationA review of the role and costs of clinical commissioning groups
A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General NHS England A review of the role and costs of clinical commissioning groups HC 1783 SESSION 2017 2019 18 DECEMBER
More informationGPC update on co-commissioning of primary care: Important Guidance for CCG member practices and LMCs
GPC update on co-commissioning of primary care: Important Guidance for CCG member practices and LMCs This paper is to inform GP practices and LMCs about options for your CCG to take greater commissioning
More informationAn interpretation of NHS England s Primary Care Co-commissioning: Regional Roadshows questions and answers Rachel Lea, Beds & Herts LMC Ltd
An interpretation of NHS England s Primary Care Co-commissioning: Regional Roadshows questions and answers Rachel Lea, Beds & Herts LMC Ltd 2. Joint Commissioning Arrangements 2.1 One option for CCGs is
More informationYouGov Survey Results
YouGov Survey Results Sample Size: 1616 Facebook users Fieldwork: 12th - 13th October 2010 Do you currently, or did you previously have a Facebook page? [Only those who said they have used facebook] I
More informationNHS South Kent Coast. Clinical Commissioning Group. Complaints, Comments and Compliments Policy
NHS South Kent Coast Clinical Commissioning Group Complaints, Comments and Compliments Policy Version: Version 1.6 Ratified by: Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
More informationTitle: care.data Pathfinder Stage CCG Recruitment and Selection Process
Ref: care.data/programme Board/Paper 06 Title: care.data Pathfinder Stage CCG Recruitment and Selection Process Author: David Corbett, Programme Head, Data Delivery Programme Board Sponsor: Eve Roodhouse,
More informationAccountable Officer Report
Accountable Officer Report 1. CCG Annual Report and Annual Public Meeting At its 24 May 2018 meeting, in line with delegated responsibilities, the Audit and Governance Committee approved the CCG s Annual
More informationPatient involvement and complaints systems
Patient involvement and complaints systems The importance of Clinical Commissioning Groups using complainant feedback to improve the quality of their complaints systems Contents The importance of CCGs
More informationPublic consultation on Europeana
Contribution ID: 941f02ae-8804-42f5-824a-fe9fbe6521fc Date: 08/11/2017 08:35:00 Public consultation on Europeana Fields marked with * are mandatory. Introduction Welcome to the consultation on Europeana.
More informationTwenty-Thirty Health care Scenarios - exploring potential changes in health care in England over the next 20 years
Twenty-Thirty Health care Scenarios - exploring potential changes in health care in England over the next 20 years Chris Evennett & Professor James Barlow The context Demographics On-going financial constraints
More informationCCG Organisational Structure
Harrow CCG Title of Meeting : Harrow CCG Governing Body Agenda Item 2 Paper No 2 Date of meeting: 24 September 2013 Attachment B CCG Organisational Structure Purpose of the report To gain Board sign off
More informationPersonal Medical Services (PMS) Contract Review Update
Personal Medical Services (PMS) Contract Review Update 1. Introduction NHS England commenced the Personal Medical Services (PMS) Review process across the North West London (NWL) Collaboration of CCGs
More informationThe risks and opportunities for CCGs when co commissioning primary care: Things to consider when making your decision
The risks and opportunities for CCGs when co commissioning primary care: Things to consider when making your decision 1 st December 2014 Introduction The ability for CCGs to become involved in commissioning
More informationWorkforce and Governing Body Members Equality Information (incorporating the WRES progress report) For further information please contact:
Equality Information Report 2016-17 Appendix 1 Workforce and Governing Body Members Equality Information (incorporating the WRES progress report) For further information please contact: Final draft Emdad
More informationHerts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group. Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG Constitution
Herts Valleys Clinical Commissioning Group Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG s constitution Agenda Item: 14 REPORT TO: HVCCG Board DATE of MEETING: 30 January 2014 SUBJECT: Review of NHS Herts Valleys CCG
More informationPatient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy. NHS South Warwickshire Clinical Commissioning Group (the CCG)
Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy (the CCG) Accountable Director: Alison Walshe Director of Quality and Performance Policy Author: Sheila Browning Associate Director Continuing Healthcare Approved
More informationPreparing the prescription. Julie Barnett Hannah Durrant Emily Rempel
Preparing the prescription Julie Barnett Hannah Durrant Emily Rempel The tonic effect of fun and play has long been recognized as an antidote to the stresses, worries, labors, and responsibilities of our
More informationMarch 2018 CCG localities profile for Hertfordshire
March 2018 CCG localities profile for Hertfordshire 2017-18 Purpose This report presents key population and health data for the ten NHS Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) localities in Hertfordshire. It
More informationPolicies for the Commissioning of Health and Healthcare
Policies for the Commissioning of Health and Healthcare Statement of Principles REFERENCE NUMBER Commissioning policies statement of principles VERSION V1.0 APPROVING COMMITTEE & DATE Governing Body 26.5.15
More informationThe Friends and Family Test score is calculated as outlined in the NHS England guidance issued in Oct-14. The calculation is as follows:
10 Children s outpatients department - NDDH - Friends and Family Test - Jun-15 to Jul-15 Friends and Family Test question: If your friends and family needed similar care or treatment to you, do you think
More informationNHS England CCG Authorisation
NHS England CCG Authorisation Post Authorisation December 2013 Review Conditions Report CCG name: Vale of York CCG Wave: 3 Regional Operations Director Jon Develing Date report generated: 22/01/2014 Vale
More informationNHS Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution. December 2012 version 7
NHS Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution December 2012 version 7 NHS Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution Introduction Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group, as
More informationLambeth Clinical Commissioning Group
Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution V003 18 June 2012 Lambeth Clinical Commissioning Group Introduction [DN: Introductory wording to be provided by CCG] Doc no. CLS/067266.5912242 i Lambeth
More informationEvidence for Effectiveness
Evidence for Effectiveness Developing a standards framework for digital health innovations Digitally empowering people to manage their health and care October 2018 The issue NHS England programmes Apps
More informationNHS Ipswich and East Suffolk CCG
CCG Profile version 0.32 PDF Created: 25/05/2012 NHS Ipswich and East Suffolk CCG Interim CCG code 06L Summary Statistics This CCG has 42 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April
More informationNHS Islington CCG. Interim CCG code. This CCG has 43 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April 2011.
CCG Profile version 0.32 PDF Created: 25/05/2012 NHS Islington CCG Interim CCG code 08H Summary Statistics This CCG has 43 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April 2011. Their total
More informationContinuing Healthcare Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy
Continuing Healthcare Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy Procedure and Guidance April 2015 Version: 1 Ratified by: Date ratified: Name of originator/author: Name of responsible committee/individual:
More informationSpecial Eurobarometer 460. Summary. Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life
Summary Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on Survey requested by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology and co-ordinated
More informationNHS Sutton CCG. Interim CCG code. This CCG has 29 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April 2011.
CCG Profile version 0.32 PDF Created: 25/05/2012 NHS Sutton CCG Interim CCG code 08T Summary Statistics This CCG has 29 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April 2011. Their total
More informationClinical Commissioning Groups: Basic decision making around delegation
briefing January 2013 Clinical Commissioning Groups: Basic decision making around delegation To delegate, or not to delegate? That is the question. If only it were that simple. The question is not whether
More informationNHS West London (K&C & QPP) CCG
CCG Profile version 0.32 PDF Created: 25/05/2012 NHS West London (K&C & QPP) CCG Interim CCG code 08Y Summary Statistics This CCG has 55 practices¹, based on those with a registered population in April
More informationMassachusetts Renewables/ Cape Wind Survey
Massachusetts Renewables/ Cape Wind Survey Prepared for Civil Society Institute (CSI) Prepared by June 7, 2006 Copyright 2006. Opinion Research Corporation. All rights reserved. Table of Contents Page
More informationResearch Specification: understanding consumer experience of first tier complaints
Research Specification: understanding consumer experience of first tier complaints Purpose To gain an understanding of consumers experience of first-tier complaints handling by approved persons. This includes:
More informationHerefordshire CCG Patient Choice and Resource Allocation Policy
Reference number HCCG0004 Last Revised January 2017 Review date February 2018 Category Corporate Governance Contact Lynne Renton Deputy Chief Nurse Who should read this All staff responsible for drawing
More informationDIGITAL GOVERNMENT TRANSFORMATION
DIGITAL GOVERNMENT TRANSFORMATION Region Survey Data Analysis Public Sector Research Group October 2015 OVERVIEW NORDIC COUNTRIES Insights Top Digital driver Citizen demands Top 3 barriers 1. Security
More informationConvergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA
EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment Convergence and Differentiation within the Framework of European Scientific and Technical Cooperation on HTA University of Tokyo, October 24,
More informationAppointment of External Auditors
Appointment of External Auditors This paper is for: Recommendation: Decision The Governing Body is asked to note the report and agree that a specialised Audit Panel be set up for the selection of the CCG
More informationCancer. Overview. average 2 It is also important to remember that this assessment is relative: a CCG might make improvements on all
Cancer Overview 1. The CCG Improvement and Assessment Framework provides information to health care organisations, professionals and patients about how their local NHS services are performing and is used
More information12. Guide to interviews
12. Guide to interviews Taking the fear out of interviews Few people enjoy them, but an interview should really be a conversation between equals where a discussion takes place. You may feel as though you
More informationSubjective Evaluation Survey
Subjective Evaluation Survey Please answer the following set of questions for each negotiation counterpart. Comment boxes are available for each question to provide additional feedback. 1. Your first name
More informationClinical Commissioning Groups HR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Clinical Commissioning Groups HR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Additional questions June 2012 Clinical Commissioning Groups HR Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Additional questions June 2012 1. The
More informationMerton Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution. [29 May] 2012
Merton Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution [29 May] 2012 Merton Clinical Commissioning Group Constitution Introduction Dear Members CHAIR S STATEMENT Merton Clinical Commissioning Group has been
More informationLet's Celebrate. You Have Finished the Seasons for Growth. Program. Post Group - Survey Levels 1-2-3
COMPANION TO COMPLETE COMPANION ID # PARTICIPANT ID # Let's Celebrate You Have Finished the Seasons for Growth Program Post Group - Survey Levels 1-2-3 (for completion by the child or young person at the
More informationDoing, supporting and using public health research. The Public Health England strategy for research, development and innovation
Doing, supporting and using public health research The Public Health England strategy for research, development and innovation Draft - for consultation only About Public Health England Public Health England
More information2. Why did you apply to the Bristol Home Energy Upgrade project? Please rank in order of importance with 1 being the most important.
Introduction To make sure Bristol is best placed to secure funding for projects like this in the future we are undertaking some in depth evaluation of the Bristol Home Energy Upgrade project. We would
More informationSHTG primary submission process
Meeting date: 24 April 2014 Agenda item: 8 Paper number: SHTG 14-16 Title: Purpose: SHTG primary submission process FOR INFORMATION Background The purpose of this paper is to update SHTG members on developments
More informationNHS HMR CCG and NHS England Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee 2015/16
NHS HMR CCG and NHS England Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee 2015/16 Date of Meeting: 15 September 2015 Agenda Item: 14 Subject: CCG Assurance New Operating Model Reporting Officer: Sandra Croasdale
More informationGender pay gap reporting tight for time
People Advisory Services Gender pay gap reporting tight for time March 2018 Contents Introduction 01 Insights into emerging market practice 02 Timing of reporting 02 What do employers tell us about their
More informationProject Status Update
Project Status Update Reporting cycle: 1 October 2016 to 30 June 2017 (Year 1) Date: 13 July 2017 Designated Charity: Funded initiative: Snapshot overview: headspace National Youth Mental Health Foundation
More informationFull file at
Chapter 2 Data Collection 2.1 Observation single data point. Variable characteristic about an individual. 2.2 Answers will vary. 2.3 a. categorical b. categorical c. discrete numerical d. continuous numerical
More informationPRIMARY CARE CO-COMMISSIONING
What is Co-Commissioning? Currently, hospital and community services are commissioned by CCGs, while primary care services are commissioned by NHSEngland, and Social Services by Local Authorities. NHSE
More informationA Short Questionnaire about life in Totnes from Plymouth University Please help!
A Short Questionnaire about life in Totnes from Plymouth University Please help! 1 Questionnaire. INTRODUCTION: Good afternoon/evening. We are doing some research into issues around energy and community
More informationLed by clinicians, accountable to local people. East Lancashire Clinical Commissioning Group: Equality & Inclusion Annual Report
Clinical Commissioning Group: Equality & Inclusion Annual Report Foreword 3 Introduction and Aims of the Report 4 Commissioning Intentions 4 Our Population 5 Compliance with the Public Sector Equality
More informationInnovation & health connected. Business plan summary
Innovation & health connected Business plan summary 2017-18 CONTENTS Contents Introduction What do we do? Our five goals Goal 1: Transformation through innovation Goal 2: Economic growth Goal 3: Adoption
More informationUnderstanding and demonstrating variation through use of national data tools
Understanding and demonstrating variation through use of national data tools Today s workshop Introduction to: RightCare and Commissioning for Value The Pathway on a page Understanding priorities from
More informationCCG Assurance and the Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard An overview of the tool, and its role in CCG assurance. Khadir Meer Richard Wells
CCG Assurance and the Balanced Scorecard Balanced Scorecard An overview of the tool, and its role in CCG assurance Khadir Meer Richard Wells July 2013 Contents 1. Background: development of the Balanced
More informationOUR APPLICATION PROCESS
OUR APPLICATION PROCESS For more information, contact the Recruitment team on 0113 203 3458. So you re thinking of applying to work at our Trust? We try to make our application and selection process as
More informationMeeting of NHS Bristol CCG Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee Meeting
Meeting of NHS Bristol CCG Primary Care Joint Commissioning Committee Meeting Minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 15 March 2016 at 2-3.30pm CCG Conference Room Minutes Present: Tara Mistry Lay Member
More informationONR Strategy 2015 to 2020
Title of publication ONR Strategy 2015 to 2020 Office for Nuclear Regulation Page 1 of 5 Introduction Nick Baldwin, Chair The Energy Act 2013 provided for the creation of ONR as an independent, statutory
More informationABHI Response to the Kennedy short study on Valuing Innovation
ABHI Response to the Kennedy short study on Valuing Innovation Introduction 1. The Association of British Healthcare Industries (ABHI) is the industry association for the UK medical technology sector.
More informationExample Report Station Community Engagement Survey
Station Community Engagement Survey Report Prepared for: EXAMPLE REPORT INTRODUCTION About this Research The results shown in this report are based on the responses to the questionnaire that your station
More informationNHS Vale of York CCG TURNAROUND ACTION PLAN
NHS Vale of York CCG TURNAROUND ACTION PLAN Ref. Area Action Priority By When Progress Responsible Status 01. Underlying Financial TP Position The material underlying deficit position highlights the unsustainable
More informationDigital Transformation Delivering Business Outcomes
Global Digital Transformation Survey Report AUSTRALIA Digital Transformation Delivering Business Outcomes 2 Contents Introduction: Australia... 3 Key findings. 4 What is the focus of digital transformation?.
More information