Roadmapping efforts for research, education and innovation in Cyber Physical Systems

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Roadmapping efforts for research, education and innovation in Cyber Physical Systems"

Branden Cole
5 years ago
Views:

Victoria Cengarle (Fortiss), John McDermid (Univ.

1 Roadmapping efforts for research, education and innovation in Cyber Physical Systems Martin Törngren Professor in Embedded Control Systems, ICES director Division of Mechatronics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Joint work with Victoria Cengarle (Fortiss), John McDermid (Univ. Of York), Roberto Passerone (Trento), Alberto Sangiovanni Vincentelli (Trento/UCB), Saddek Bensalem (Univ. Joseph Fourier), Martin Grimheden (KTH) + contributions from many other experts! 15 Jan 15

2 Outline A. Kort om syftet med Cyphers B. Utförda undersökningar och resultat C. Förslag på åtgärder från projektet Paus D. Vad kan vi göra inom ICES och tillsammans med relaterade initiativ för att stärka regionen? 15 Jan 15 2

3 Cyber physical systems (~2006) Integration of computation, networking and physical processes where CPS range from minuscule (pace makers) to large scale (e.g. national power grid). 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 3

4 The Emerging IT Scene: CPS will be ubiquitous. Immense opportunities! The Cloud! Infrastructural core Sensory swarm Mobile access 4 Courtesy: J. Rabaey 10 Dez 14 Copyright Alberto Sangiovanni Vincentelli 4

5 Initiatives and hype terms IoT/IoS/IoE, CPS, the Swarm, M2M, Industrial internet, Smarter planet, Industry 4.0, etc. Gartner hype cycle 15 Jan

6 CPS Relevance and Opportunities: McKinsey s Disruptive Technologies 10 Dez 14 6

7 Cyber physical systems (~2006) Integration of computation, networking and physical processes where CPS range from minuscule (pace makers) to large scale (e.g. national power grid). Not new but Increasing scale, extending to systems of systems From closed to ubiquitous mass products New domains and cross domains! Never so easy to design, produce and market New opportunities, threats and risks 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 7

www.cyphers.eu fortiss (Munich) KTH (Stockholm) U. Josef Fourier (Grenoble) U. Trento U.

8 fortiss (Munich) KTH (Stockholm) U. Josef Fourier (Grenoble) U. Trento U. York Siemens (Munich), affiliated partner Support Action Project reference: Programme FP7 ICT, area ICT Start date: 01 JULY 2013 Duration: 18 months 8

9 CyPhERS will survey, analyse, evaluate the economic, technical, scientific, societal significance of Cyber Physical Systems for Europe, and develop an integrated strategic CPS research agenda for Europe, derive comprehensive recommendations for action that will cover the identification and prioritization of research areas, support measures for both horizontal and vertical cooperation, and an outline of possible research partnerships, and address questions of research funding as well as the issues of training, standardization and policies. 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 9

10 Approach of CyPhERS State of the art NIST CPS reports PCAST reports SoS, CPSoS ICTLabs SIA H2020 ARTEMIS SRA Industrie 4.0 ITEA roadmap Technology assessment Domain analysis CPS in the world Market analysis model CPS characterization SWOT analysis Preliminary recommendations Expert workshops and interactions CPSWeek 2014 Stockholm Munich National meetings Feedback 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 10

11 Reference material D5.2 CPS: Significance, Challenges and Opportunities D4.2 CPS Technologies D3.2 Market and innovation potential of CPS 15 Jan 15 11

12 CPS relation to other concepts Mechatronics CPS in the small Embedded systems Big Data Different perspectives!! CPS IoT CPS in the large CPSoS SoS Set sizes are not representative Building systems out of the underlying technologies! Trend of increasing overlap! See CyPhERS deliverable D5.2 for details 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 12 12

13 A strategic research and innovation agenda for CPS considerations and focus Directed to funding agencies and policy makers Technology, Market and Application domain perspectives Europe s position and SWOT analysis Health, manufacturing, smart grid, smart cities, and transportation Commonalities cross domains: Technology; Market; Societal; Programs 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 13 13

14 Preliminary list of shared crossdomain concerns Quality design, trustworthy services and platforms Education and training (engineering, end users, decision makers, ) Safety, security and privacy, dealing with new risks and threats. Open data access and procedures towards big data analytics Interoperability across the engineering life cycle Human machine interaction and collaboration Leveraging CPS to deal with societal challenges, including sustainability and an aging population Regulations needing to evolve and EU harmonization Risk taking for innovation and promoting innovation Program aspects, incentivizing cross domain and discipline fertilization, and addressing a broader set of stakeholders. 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 14

15 Structure of the preliminary findings Market perspective Market model Technology and Science Education Societal Research and innovation programs 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 15 15

16 Structured CPS market model Economic impact of the CPS innovation on the ecosystem, and assessment of disruptiveness Value chains and missing pieces Products and services positioning Business models 1. Domain model as is model of the economic ecosystem 2. Scenario identification and analysis CPS innovation or opportunity Constraints which need action to address 3. Competitive and business analysis CyPhERS D3.2 Market Model to be models of the economic ecosystem Potential returns and threats 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 16

17 Market related findings Market related SWOT analysis European weaknesses: No major software (services) companies, such as Google or Microsoft and weaker on telecommunications Threats: Major players in the software (services) and telecommunications markets have finance to strengthening and broadening their position CPS technologies enable product differentiation and market penetration Disruptiveness cases identified in scenario studies: Automotive city cars Manufacturing 3D printing 15 Jan 15 17

18 Examples of market related recommendations Disintermediation counter strategies: Promote education, training and innovation in CPS related fields Integration oriented innovations, exploiting system level product knowledge Commoditization e.g. exploiting cloud infrastructures and open source, treating software supplier offerings as commodities Services through business models addressing value added services as a product besides tangible assets Sponsor research on cyber security (big data, cloud, safety, SoS) Domain specific recommendations Promote safe introduction of autonomous vehicles and services Support data interoperability standards in domains from industrial automation to assisted living 18

19 Technology and Science preliminary findings CPS design methodology for trustworthy endto end services including adaptive and autonomous systems Platforms for CPS design that underpin design methodology, facilitating integration and establishing desired system level properties. 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 19

20 Education and training preliminary findings Improvement of the status of teaching and its management throughout education T shaped CPS Engineering Programs Engineers ready to engineer, with long lasting knowledge, and the ability to learn Incentives for academia/industrial collaboration, best engineering practices and industrial skills Development and promotion of educational platforms, open labs, and maker spaces. Promotion of CPS training for practicing engineers. 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 20

21 Societal perspective additional preliminary findings Acceptability of CPS Public consensus building on safety, security and privacy, dealing with new risks, threats and trade offs E.g. infrastructure reliance; automation and failures Risk of digital divide Regulatory frameworks; legislation & standards Blocking standards and legislation; Harmonization Liability 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 21

22 Research and innovation programs preliminary findings Programs stimulating cross domain R&I should be initiated Cross domain/discipline collaboration schemes Multidisciplinary research projects (e.g. embedded systems, cloud, human machine interaction). NOE s Support and stimulate research & innovation efforts balanced throughout TRL levels 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 22

23 Industry as lab Getting stakeholders together End user studies Stakeholder partnerships Training & education Legal frameworks Multidisciplinary research and NoE s CPS pilots and demonstrators Business models Technology A, B, C, Standards 15 Jan 15 Martin Törngren, KTH Roadmapping efforts for CPS 23

24 Summary A technological paradigm shift, affecting Society and markets Engineering and education Addressing cross domain/discipline/technology barriers, opportunities and threats CyPhERS delivers in February: Final phase: Validation and prioritization Relating to existing efforts: ECSEL; H2020; Eureka/ITEA; KIC s 15 Jan 15 24

25 Outline A. Kort om syftet med Cyphers B. Utförda undersökningar och resultat C. Förslag på åtgärder från projektet Paus D. Vad kan vi göra inom ICES och tillsammans med relaterade initiativ för att stärka regionen? 15 Jan 15 25

26 Questions for the discussion Are these the right areas? Missing areas? Prioritization? What are EC level issues (i.e. for H2020)? What should concretely be recommended? What issues are best dealt with by industry? What issues are best dealt with by ICES? Vad kan vi göra inom ICES och tillsammans med relaterade initiativ för att stärka regionen? 15 Jan 15 26

CyPhers Project: Main Results

CyPhers Project: Main Results Saddek Bensalem / shortened Presentation by Sebastian Engell (CPSoS) SoS Open Workshop, Florence May 28, 2015 fortiss (Munich) KTH (Stockholm) U. Joseph Fourier (Grenoble)