How to build large European projects. Lessons learned from the Arrowhead project Professor Jerker Delsing

Transcription

1 How to build large European projects Lessons learned from the Arrowhead project Professor Jerker Delsing

2 Perspectives TCP/IP everywhere, middleware nowhere. 50 billion connected devices 2020 Ericsson, 2011 Annual growths more than 10% and over 40 billion devices are expected worldwide by Artemis SRA 2011

3 Funding possibility Artemis is pushing for AIPP:s Artemis Innovation Pilot Programs This to ensure enough national funding to the Artemis-JU 6 AIPP:s planed Work by Artemis WG SRA

4 Call text AIPP4: Production and Energy Global society objectives Systems Automation Europe s manufacturing, energy, process and logistics industry is a very important segment particularly for jobs/employment creation, which makes it by far the largest sector. Productivity improvements in this sector will therefore have major impact to the European economy, both to the production outcome and to the competitiveness of European industry compared to other market leaders. The industries are constantly facing new and increasing challenges such as managing in an efficient manner the energy consumption, harder environmental regulations, better raw material yields, more efficient plants from both energy consumption and production outcomes viewpoints, more competitive products and solutions, higher product quality and better production processes just to name a few. The very high level of challenge is facing our society considering the cycle of production and consumption of resources like energy and integrating in an end to end process the manufacturing management and the energy management. From a centralized solution and a set of non-connected silos, we have now to chain the integrated scope. This future of XXX 5 infrastructure will require the global integrity of large numbers of interacting, independent and autonomous systems from different organisations. This will pose new challenges for the integration of these intelligent sub-systems so they can be used collectively. Embedded Systems will have to be network enabled, and incorporate capabilities of self-management, self-supervision and the means for selforganization as well as failure auto-recover mechanisms. Many sectors like water and waste water treatment, mining, minerals, gas and oil and also construction are indeed energy intensive and have a high effect on Europe s CO2 emission. Technology and Production Process Management and Control Improvements for energy efficiency and logistics will therefore make a significant contribution to a sustainable society and reduction of the greenhouse effect. Raw material like oil and gas, forestry and mineral and its refining plants cannot be off-shored but down the product building value chain European jobs are threatened. Other challenges are the reduction of heavy manual work, improved working conditions, and people and plant safety. Therefore, enabling the efficient integration of production and energy systems will be part of a developing eco-society paradigm. These challenges require: o new and improved processes, o smarter and more flexible and sometimes fast reconfigurable production systems, o supply and efficient management of utilities and energy, o better use of new emerging paradigms and associated technologies, like Service-Oriented Architectures, Complex Systems-of-Systems Engineering resulting in Smart (efficient) Manufacturing Solutions, resulting in Smart, Efficient Production Solutions

5 Requirements 4.2 Contribution to the ARTEMIS Strategic targets ARTEMIS has an over-arching objective to close the design productivity gap between potential and capability. The results arising from Projects responding to this call will be expected to: reduce the cost of the system design from 2011 levels by 15%; achieve 15% reduction in development cycles - especially in sectors requiring qualification or certification from 2011 levels; manage a complexity increase of 25% with 10% effort reduction, compared with 2011; reduce the effort and time required for re-validation and recertification of systems after making changes by 15%, compared with 2011 levels; achieve cross-sectorial reusability of Embedded Systems devices and architecture platforms (for example, interoperable components (hardware and software) for automotive, railways, aerospace and manufacturing) that will be developed using the ARTEMIS JU results.

6 Evaluation criteria 1. Relevance and contributions to the objectives of the Call. Relevance will be considered in relation to the topic(s) of the work programme open in a given call and to the objectives of the Innovation Pilot Programmes for those topics as set out in Sections to Relevance and contributions to the ARTEMIS general requirements set out in paragraph 4.1 Relevance and contribution to the ARTEMIS strategic targets listed in section R&D&I and technical excellence: Soundness of the R&D&I concept Clarity and quality of the objectives and expected results Progress beyond the of state-of-the-art in innovating; progress beyond the state of industrial practice Leveraging on existing / previous projects, with emphasis on ARTEMIS projects. 3. Technological solution for innovation and work plan Quality and effectiveness of the methodology Quality of the work plan. Quality and effectiveness of the demonstration and related infrastructure Quality of new set-up experimentation platform for co-creation and collaboration, or interaction with existing ones, including end-users involvement. 4. Market innovation and market impact Contribution, at the European and/or international level, to the expected impacts of the work programme, and specifically to the expected impacts of the Innovation Pilot programmes) that the proposed project intends to address as set out in Sections to and in Section 4 Degree of application innovation in the context of the Innovation Pilot programmes addressed. Market impact and quality of the exploitation plans of the industrial partners; quality of the market analysis section including competitor descriptions and market opportunities. Introduction and enablement of new, more competitive business practices and methodologies. Appropriateness of measures for the dissemination of project results. Contribution to standards. Management of intellectual property. Interaction with the CoIE 5. Quality of consortium and management 9. Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures. Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants. Quality of the consortium as a whole including complementarities, balance and involvement of SMEs. Effectiveness of the eco-system: large scale and critical mass, and further plan for attracting other partners and reinforcing the eco-system. Appropriateness of the level, allocation and justification of the resources to be committed, either tangible or intangible such as staff, equipment, (access to) infrastructure, know-how, patents, etc.

7 Arrowhead Process and energy system automation Prof. Jerker Delsing, ProcessIT.EU/LTU The association for R&D actors in embedded systems

8 Vision Enable collaborative automation by networked embedded devices. 8

9 Grand challenges Enabling the interoperability of services provided by almost any device. Enabling the integrability of services provided by almost any device. 9

10 Service and system of systems based collaborative EFFICIENCY Evolving the collaborative automation cloud Necessities Technology integration, Services and systems Interoperability and orchestration The collaborative automation cloud Enables the integration to and migration from legacy to: Automation clouds The collaborative automation cloud The collaborative automation cloud 10

11 Service based collaborative automation Providing Efficient energy utilization Environment friendliness Raw material yield Production efficiency Product quality The collaborative automation cloud through The collaborative automation cloud Solutions created Inter domain and Cross domain through Technology integration, Service Interoperability and orchestration High performance analytics, mobile device integration and futuristic enterprise services 11

12 AIPP4 Production(process and manufacturing) and energy system automation Application domains 12

13 Application domains of AIPP4 Efficient production (manuf/process) Smart cities The Virtual market for energy Electro-mobility Energy production 13

14 Arrowhead an ARTEMIS proposal 4 years project 82M 80 partners 8404 person months Proposal coordinated by LTU 14

15 Swedish partners SKF Midroc LKAB, Boliden Abelko BNearIT EISTEC Noda RTC LTU Swedish PA Vinnova Make the close contact 15

16 Submission Sept !!!

17 Evaluation Scored 45 out of 60 Threshold 40 Rank 5 17

18 Funding possibility Artemis is pushing for AIPP:s, 2 AIPP:s submitted Expect 2 to be funded at the level of 60-85M AIPP1 lead by AVL, Austria AIPP4/6, lead by ProcessIT.EU, Sweden 18

19 Budget Total proposal budget +82 M Swedish budget M Outcome Total budget 66M Swedish budget 10.8M LTU budget 3.6 M 19

20 Current status Arrowhead is invited to negotiation Expected Artemis-JU Grant Agreement before 27/2 Contract into force March 2013 Project start March 11 First Arrowhead assembly March 14 in Brussels

21 HowTo main points Ensure support at home Build an internal team Build the consortia Write the proposal Fix all admin data Submit on time 21

22 Ensure support at home Get money for building the proposal ProcessIT.EU coordinating AIPP4/6 proposal Funded by ProcessIT.EU: 500 kkr SRT LTU strategic grant: 500 kkr LTU large application grant: 200kkr Total cost at EISLAB >1.500 kkr 22

23 Team Team at LTU JD Anders OE Mats B Johansson Katharina Wennberg Petra Jansson Jan Marcusson, Consortial agreement,grant agreement,... Ann Jonsson, funding and legal issues 23

24 Build the consortia Build a core project partner team Attract partners Run the politics Check consortia against evaluation criteria 24

25 Write the proposal Distribute drafts Get comments Run phone conferences with partners and consortia Define the budget Important Ensure quality in your considering call Requirements and Evaluation criteria 25

26 Building large project Challenges Understanding the call? What does officers understand? What does the reviewers understand? How is the funding scheme designed? Tri-partite - EC, PA, Industry!!! Building consortia? 80 partners - 80 different agendas! Write proposal! Develop the proposal idea!!!! Get input from partners? Mold input to the idea! Team to write the proposal Project leadership and coordination Economy