SBA Yesterday & Today: Current View of SBA in Advanced Systems Engineering and System-of-Systems Environment. Dr. Judith Dahmann

Transcription

1 SBA Yesterday & Today: Current View of SBA in Advanced Systems Engineering and System-of-Systems Environment Dr. Judith Dahmann

2 SBA concepts have been a topic of interest for several years Where are we in implementing these concepts in today s systems acquisitions? Growing emphasis on Network Centric Warfare, Coalition Operation and Systems of Systems How do SBA concepts support tomorrow s acquisition environments?

3 Simulation-Based Acquisition Defined A concept which envisions greater and more integrated use of modeling and simulation in the acquisition process. DoD and industry would be enabled by robust, collaborative use of simulation technology that is integrated across acquisition programs and phases. November 1998

4 Origins Need for More Cost Effective Acquisition Process Declining defense budgets and changing force structure Modernization/Transformation versus Recapitalization 1995 Vice President s National Performance Review (NPR) -- 25% reduction in delivery time for new systems Department of Defense (DoD) stretch of NPR goal to 50% reduction, plus reduction in Total Ownership Costs Cost-performance consideration allow routine use of advanced IT, modeling and simulation tools Defense Systems Affordability Council recognizes M&S potential

5 SBA Benefits Risk Reduction Continuous evaluation of system development Rapid evaluation of concept design Reduce and delay need for physical prototype Facilitate continuous user participation in development process Efficient development/evaluation of manufacturing plans Reuse of system software and hardware in training simulators M&S Use in the Army Acquisition Process, Dr Herbert K. Fallin, Jr; 1997

6 Original Goals Substantially reduce the time, resources and risk associated with the entire acquisition process Increase the quality, military worth and supportability of fielded systems, while reducing their total ownership costs throughout the total life cycle Enable Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD) across the entire acquisition life cycle.

7 1998 SBA Roadmap Joint SBA task force, including government and industry, identified cultural, process, and technical elements Identified actions needed to implement new approach to systems acquisition efficiently, expeditiously, and non-intrusively

8 Key Ideas Shared system or product description a shared, definitive source of data describing the system which evolves as the system matures and serves as a common reference for multiple disciplines through system development life cycle Multiple concurrent views and assessments of the system based on shared system descriptive data allowing for consideration of more options, and their implications, at each stage of the development and acquisition process Early and continuous use of simulation in lieu of hardware prototyping and live test; by representing as many aspects of a systems in simulation for as long as possible, reducing costs of development Common tools employed at different stages of the acquisition process and reuse of tools (including simulations) which have been used by others, reducing cost and time and increasing credibility since each user doesn't have to do all the tool development for themselves

9 Joint Strike Fighter JSF Strike Warfare JSF Engineering & Manufacturing Collaborative Environment (SWCE) Toolset Collaborative Environment (EMCE) Toolset JSF Suite of Models and Simulations SoM&S) ( SWCE SoM&S EMCE SoM&S MSDB Scenarios Databases JSF Distributed Product Description (DPD) Authoritative Systems Data Base (ASDB) MSDB Scenarios Databases JSF Resource Access System (RAS)

10 DDXX Engineering analysis models (e.g., ASAP, RTS) Wargame models (e.g., MARS) Embedded SW Geometric Data Non-geometric Data Analysis Results Behavioral Data Hardware in the loop MARVEDS Physical models & tests Other models

11 Aerial Common Sensor Engineering Analysis/ ACS Virtual Prototype Operational Analysis Synthetic Environment Operational Training Synthetic Environment Spiral Development Loops Total Ownership Cost Model Analysis 5/10/00 835GR.53.06

12 Army Future Combat System FCS Advanced Collaborative Environment Government Led Future Combat Collaborative Environment (FCCE) LSI Led Design/Engineering/Manufacturing Collaborative Environment (DEMCE) FCS M&S Upgrades Test, Evaluation, Analysis, Experimentation, Demonstration Develop/refine/illuminate concepts, doctrine, TTP View operational & force effectiveness parameters Training Interfaces Computer Aided Systems Engineering Computer Aided Design Computer Aided Manufacturing Virtual System Assessment Visualization Design/Engineering Review Gov t Tools LSI Tools FCS M&S Upgrades FCS PM Documents Gov t Private FCS Distributed Product Description (DPD) Gov t Private Shared Segment FCS Army/Industry Resource Repository (FAIRR) Blue System Data/Models Red System Data/Models Scenario Databases Environment Databases Integrated Data Environment (Windchill based) Management and Collaborative Tools LSI Private Archived M&S LSI Private Other Users (Army, Navy, Air Force, Joint, etc.)

13 Technology Adoption Life Cycle Where are we today? Innovators Early Adopters Early Majority Late Majority Laggards Boeing 777? JSF? DDXX? FCS? SBA Roadmap? probably further to the left than we would like to think..

14 NDIA SBA Conference May 2001 Findings Progress has be made Programs/Services are creating the systems engineering environments for their specific applications Industry investing for their own competitive advantage However. Limited attention to system-wide issues Ongoing developments will not work together across systems throughout the lifecycle to create the needed leverage Many needed components are available from ongoing efforts, but these are not designed to be reused, there is duplication of efforts and there are missing elements

15 System of Systems Pose New Challenges Systems of systems pose new challenges For operations. and for development To address these challenges, common environments which can be used across systems are needed In each of the Services, and at the DOD level, new initiatives are being created to address the SOS development issues These new initiatives provide broader and more extensible advanced systems engineering environments to support future system development

16 Air Force Joint Synthetic Battlespace WARFIGHTER Requirements, Training & Rehearsal Joint Synthetic Battlespace Government Sites Contractor Sites ACQUISITION S&T, R&D, T&E NCAOC JNTF (SWC) OFFUTT AFB (RJ MT) SMC 56 FW AFRL Mesa TACCSF 19 SOS RJ Bell Ft Hood (CCTT) AFC2TIG IWC Today: Unable to Fully Understand Operational Impacts in a Heavily Vegetated Environment --Camouflage, Hyper-spectral, Future: Able to Understand Operational Impacts in all Environments A Common Architecture That: -Represents the Natural Environment Realistically -Physics Based Sensor Models -Allows Integration of Legacy Simulations Today: Unable to Fully Understand System of Systems and Environmental Impacts Future: Simulations Readily Available to Assess System Complexities

17 Army Joint Virtual Battlespace SMART (Simulation & Modeling for Acquisition, Requirements and Training) Tool To Support The Objective Force and Future Combat System JVB Design Includes: Joint Forces Legacy Forces Objective Force Future Combat Systems - C3 - ISR - Robots - New Weapons Dynamic Weather Dynamic Terrain High Fidelity Terrain Certified Data Command and Control NTM Global Hawk Joint Environment M1A2 Joint Strike Fighter M577 JSTARS Army Environment AC S FCS Network Centric Carrier Comanche JVB 04-19a

18 Navy Collaborative Engineering Environment Requirement Documents Requirement MEMO SRD MNS ORD Function Information Functi Functi on Model on Model Analysis Tool DOORS Function Analysis Tool Structured Requirements Function Baselines Project Repository Interchange (Server) Architecture Information Experime System nt Data Data Interface Data Architecture Representation Rational Rose DIAD JMAAT Operational View System View Technical View CORE Physical Implementation Information Systems Spec Resource Constraint Interchange Client LSSE Analysis TRIMS M&S COST MODELS HSI CAD/CAM COP AT RAB RCA

19 Joint Distributed Engineering Plant AWACS 30/35 w/rsip Boeing Seattle TPS-59 MCTSSA JDEP 2002/3 PATRIOT PDB 5 Huntsville AEGIS Ships B/L NSWC DD ATRC/DOC E-2 ESTELLE PAX River JDEP will build interoperable forces by providing a tool for Developers to engineer interoperability into their systems Testers to test and evaluate interoperability among systems War fighters to assess operational capabilities of forces Federation Manager Patriot Scenario E2 AWACS AEGIS TPS-59 Data Collector/ Viewer Single Integrated Air Picture (SIAP) Systems Engineer Pilot development of systems of systems engineering environment for the DOD

20 Interoperable Systems of Systems Require Interoperable Development Environments AF JSB Army JVB Navy CEE Coalition Partners Shared System of Systems Development Capability JDEP As with interoperable war fighting capabilities, Service and Joint development capabilities must work together to create the needed system of systems development and engineering environment

21 Challenges Challenges of advanced systems of systems engineering environments parallel those of interoperable operational systems of systems Cooperation among Services and DOD communities to create need components Need ways to continue to identify and address technical and policy areas Key interfaces and common standards Opportunities for shared developments Building components for reuse and sharing Routine application of shared engineering capabilities throughout the system of systems life cycle

22 Future Vision Today 2003 Sys A Sys D Sys Y Sys X Sys B Sys C System Focus Joint Staff Mission Areas (MA) To Be - Precision Engagement - Deployment/Redeployment - Dominant Maneuver - Strategic Deterrence - Overseas Presence & Force Projection - Special Operations - Joint C2 - Focused Logistics - Information Superiority - Multinational Ops & Interagency Coordination - Full Dimensional Protection Joint C2 Sys A Sys X Sys D Sys Y Sys B Sys C Joint C2 Sys A Sys B Sys D Mission Focus System of System Engineering Environments Simulation-supported system of system engineering environments will develop hand-in-hand with mission area capabilities

23 Summary Concepts of simulation support to acquisition and development are key to advanced engineering environments Early emphasis on individual systems and improved efficiency Future direction toward enabling systems of systems development, test and war fighter assessment Interoperable systems of systems to support joint war fighting requires shared system of system engineering environments